Something something they've evolved.in Star Trek computer security seems to be a lost technology, Starfleet literally has a 4-digit password to gain remote control of a ship.
Something something they've evolved.in Star Trek computer security seems to be a lost technology, Starfleet literally has a 4-digit password to gain remote control of a ship.
This is why they don’t let fans near the show, but both Snoop Dogg and Kevin Bacon *are* professional actors so if they wanted to ask Terry Matalas nicely? It is always good to have established names in guest roles especially if they want to make Star Trek more mainstream. Also, only the show runner can decide on saving the Romulan sun or not, and I think that Terry Matalas is happy with it as it is.1) Crazy Holodeck Theory
2) Seven of Nine
3) Enterprise-F
But it was just a joke. Maybe should have said stopping the Romulan Supernova instead.
As for Snoop Dogg/Kevin Bacon, I’m assuming you’re joking too…
Data sure gets it!-_-
IRL, No Password is safe underneath 10 Characters with any combination of Letters, #'s, other characters. It can be easily "Brute Forced"!
I recommend 15 charcters as the new "minimum" for now.
By the time of Star Trek, you should be easily have Character limits that are up to 255 characters with accepting Characters/Letters/Symbols from all Federation Member Languages.
And they never did fix that problem, given Dreadnok can access the Protostar systems by duplicating Chakotay's voice, when Chakotay isn't even on the ship. A fact which the ship's command hologram is aware of, at that.While Starfleet once again obviously doesn’t: why is the computer accepting voice input from Picard on the bridge if it knows very well that Picard is in engineering?
Incompetent Computer System Security Design that is based on only 1x Biometric Factor.While Starfleet once again obviously doesn’t: why is the computer accepting voice input from Picard on the bridge if it knows very well that Picard is in engineering?
and two factor authentication. My password isn’t going to be very useful if you need my phone to log into my email account. There are of course ways to go around this, but at least it’s more difficult.Honestly, lax security is more or less how it works today. Most people’s personal data and information has already been stolen and is available on the dark web via many data breaches over the years. The only thing preventing your identity getting stolen is the sheer abundance of other identities they could also choose from.
Incompetent Computer System Security Design that is based on only 1x Biometric Factor.
Instead of as many Biometric Factors as possible in real time.
Which by the 24th century, it should be able to do a Full Body Molecular scan to validate that your body is you, with no strange life-forms attached, and that all factors short of neural brain patterns (Which requires a medical sensor attached to your head for that info).
We know they should, both you & I would've dealt with this long ago.Trek should really address this issue.
Given the amount of technology they have for real time sensor data that can (in detail) analyse a person down to the subatomic level (even those with disguises), it really makes little sense to have only voice print authorisation... especially if the person is not onboard, etc.
I mean, don't get me wrong, I like Trek, but these security issues are downright persistent and something SF should really address.
Keep the UI friendly and accessible to everyone, but for crying out loud, enhance the ID of a person using all sensor parameters, and if the computer is able to recognize a person even without their commbadge (which is possible as each person't physioligy is pretty much unique), it should be more than doable to track people onboard without a commbadge... or even if they are off the ship (barring of course external interference).
yeah. I was just rewatching Tattoo the other day and when the captain orders to beam up Chakotay they beam up his communicator, which he’s not wearing, instead…seriously?!Trek should really address this issue.
Given the amount of technology they have for real time sensor data that can (in detail) analyse a person down to the subatomic level (even those with disguises), it really makes little sense to have only voice print authorisation... especially if the person is not onboard, etc.
I mean, don't get me wrong, I like Trek, but these security issues are downright persistent and something SF should really address.
Keep the UI friendly and accessible to everyone, but for crying out loud, enhance the ID of a person using all sensor parameters, and if the computer is able to recognize a person even without their commbadge (which is possible as each person't physioligy is pretty much unique), it should be more than doable to track people onboard without a commbadge... or even if they are off the ship (barring of course external interference).
yeah. I was just rewatching Tattoo the other day and when the captain orders to beam up Chakotay they beam up his communicator, which he’s not wearing, instead…seriously?!
I think the worst example is the most recent season of Disco, when Tarka kidnaps Reno and holds her on Book's ship, yet Advanced Sentient Supercomputer Zora still believes Reno is onboard Disco, because her comm badge is. Even worse, the comm badge was stored in a small compartment which couldn't even fit a human inside.yeah. I was just rewatching Tattoo the other day and when the captain orders to beam up Chakotay they beam up his communicator, which he’s not wearing, instead…seriously?!
I mean, in DS9 Bashir and Ross take off their badges when they go "off the record" so if they were to be emergency beamed away would they just get the badges? It's such a weird hole in security. So, if people are sleeping do they wear their badges?As we know, commbadges are usually used to keep track of people onboard and while on a planetary surface (while on duty of course, people need to be reachable)... but, the commbadge should be able to signal to the ship that its no longer being worn for example, and beaming up a person under such circumstances would have to be done by scanning for their bio signs (aka, since each person is unique in terms of physiology, so use that to identify them).
I mean, in DS9 Bashir and Ross take off their badges when they go "off the record" so if they were to be emergency beamed away would they just get the badges? It's such a weird hole in security. So, if people are sleeping do they wear their badges?
good question, in Scisms the computer knows exactly when the people addicted while sleeping have disappeared (even retroactively, if memory serves!) and Riker obviously wasn’t keeping a commbadge on his pijama.I mean, in DS9 Bashir and Ross take off their badges when they go "off the record" so if they were to be emergency beamed away would they just get the badges? It's such a weird hole in security. So, if people are sleeping do they wear their badges?
Ultimately, this will be the final arbiter.Needs of the plot.
Hell, the availability of easy to use security (full disk encryption, biometrics, et. al) is defeated by people simply not employing them when in possession of sensitive data and hardware. I can't tell you how many computers I repaired where the password was 'password,' or '12345.'Honestly, lax security is more or less how it works today. Most people’s personal data and information has already been stolen and is available on the dark web via many data breaches over the years. The only thing preventing your identity getting stolen is the sheer abundance of other identities they could also choose from.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.