• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Prodigy 1x07 - "First Con-tact"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    76
That's as good a definition as any. Do you think children are slaves to their parents?
No, but I'm not sure what you mean. My question was not intended to be an obnoxious 'why would you blah blah blah' type response. I was thinking about selling and buying, which is very heavily connected to slavery, but I guess I never thought it was a prerequisite, but then I was thinking about ownership in general. Can you own something without having power to exchange it?
 
I don't think female Ferengi really count as slaves per se because...they don't appear to work, and forced labor is pretty much the definition of slavery, not mere lack of freedom.
 
So working in the house is not working?

My general thought though was more along the lines that if we define slavery as just a lack of freedom, then that means that prisoners are slaves. Ferengi women are certainly trapped within their culture, but as portrayed (mostly in DS9) they didn't appear to have a substantial burden of domestic labor put upon them.

Regardless, checked Memory Alpha, and saw this:

Marriage, like everything else in Ferengi culture, was a business contract, signed between the prospective groom and the bride's father, in which the father leased his daughter to the groom for a set period (usually five years) for an agreed fee, paid on the birth of a son. (DS9: "Doctor Bashir, I Presume") Pregnancies were considered rentals under Ferengi law, with the father being the lessee. (DS9: "Nor the Battle to the Strong")

So yeah, okay, that is explicit slavery. Daughters being treated explicitly as property, and rented out? No other way to describe it.
 
Ferengi patriarchy is more a form of emotional abuse and enslavement than it is actual physical slavery. Like having a beaten-down and subservient servant or butler that isn't actually abused in any physical sense and gets to share the home with their employer but is not allowed to do much outside the home and frequently told they're not worthy of the same legal rights as the employer.
 
Pel and Ishka definitely gave off vibes that females were told to their faces they were equal to males but were treated otherwise by the law. "You're an awesome mother and are the reason our children grew up to become such successful businessmen, but you know you can't wear clothing so get it off. Now."
 
And as we've seen how most Ferengi women are treated, Quark is obviously full of shit.

I feel like lumping patriarchal misogyny into slavery demeans both struggles against such.

Even being near the galactic core (but at the Delta-Gamma quadrant border - and in the Delta Quadrant) would still take them DECADES to reach Earth at say Warp 9.

Earth alone is some 26000 Ly's away from the Galactic core... but UFP spans across 8000 Ly's in late 24th century (probably more by 2383)... so, the Protostar is still a good way away from UFP space... however, they might be meeting species that heard of the UFP more frequently than not.

Although if anything, I'd say the kids have higher chances of meeting Neelix and his Talaxian friends. Ah that would be cool to see animated Neelix interacting with holo Janeway.

I think that if you ever try to take Star Trek distances seriously then you have put more effort into it than any of the writers.
 
I think that if you ever try to take Star Trek distances seriously then you have put more effort into it than any of the writers.
It's actually TNG and later writers that ignored TOS/TAS travel times and made up a new system completely inconsistent with what was established before. TAS "Magicks of Megas-Tu" showed the Enterprise NCC-1701 was perfectly capable of reaching the galactic center and Star Trek 5 merely followed up on that. Even casual TOS dialogue like Cheron being in the southern portion of the galaxy in "Let that be your last battlefield", while an obvious nod to American southern racial issues, are actually meaningless if the Federation doesn't have capability to reach all sides of the galaxy (southern part of the galaxy is meaningless if the Federation is only in the southern part).

Thus TNG's travel times and the infamous issue of Voyager being unable to return home when no such issue existed in Star Trek 5 was actually the result of later writers not following what was established in TOS/TAS/TOS movies.
 
It's actually TNG and later writers that ignored TOS/TAS travel times and made up a new system completely inconsistent with what was established before. TAS "Magicks of Megas-Tu" showed the Enterprise NCC-1701 was perfectly capable of reaching the galactic center and Star Trek 5 merely followed up on that. Even casual TOS dialogue like Cheron being in the southern portion of the galaxy in "Let that be your last battlefield", while an obvious nod to American southern racial issues, are actually meaningless if the Federation doesn't have capability to reach all sides of the galaxy (southern part of the galaxy is meaningless if the Federation is only in the southern part).

Thus TNG's travel times and the infamous issue of Voyager being unable to return home when no such issue existed in Star Trek 5 was actually the result of later writers not following what was established in TOS/TAS/TOS movies.

For our Trek RPG, I actually said that subspace rifts and "currents" made travel times and charting dramatically different in a feast of handwavium.
 
I'm confused. This Ferengi raised Dal (what a bad moogi) for some time in what looks like a reasonably modern (for the time) Ferengi starship, but he's still unfamiliar with the tech on the Protostar? I can accept that she never mentioned the Federation and maybe doesn't have a holodeck/suite aboard, but we know she has transporters...? Also of course we have another member of an alpha quadrant species far away from their home space, so that mystery continues. On the bright side, 8 or so short years after Rom made nagus and there's a clothed Ferengi female quoting rules of acquisition and flying around in her own ship for years...

I’ve never been a huge fan of the Prime Directive, which in retrospect seems condescending. It’s even less fitting here. Here you have a ship full of vulnerable, gullible orphaned kids, albeit on an immensely powerful salvage ship, with powerful enemies. Suddenly THEY are supposed to be worrying about the Prime Directive? Janeway is a hologram, programmed with Starfleet protocols, but the actual Janeway would probably have different answers to give these kids who desperately need help. The alien civilization might have had help to offer them if they explained their situation.

Well, she still seems to be operating under the impression that they're Starfleet cadets at this point.

Sisko should have probably been imprisoned as a war criminal for killing a Romulan Ambassador... but let's just ignore that.

Accessory after the fact...

I think obsessive devotion to that guiding principle is the greater wrong. Picard acted like a slave to it so much as to think extinction is preferable to interfering in an alien culture. Whatever 'natural' development a people has it's surely much worse if the culture dies when those who can help don't.

Yeah; Pen Pals and Homeward Picard is terrifying.

Floor pie.

How you doin'?

Anyone else notice they used a Mars height map for the orbit shots of the planet? You can clearly see Valles Marineris
2Q.png

Hodgkin's Law of parallel planetary development?

the 09 JJ film was the best of the trilogy.

Well...in the top two...

For our Trek RPG, I actually said that subspace rifts and "currents" made travel times and charting dramatically different in a feast of handwavium.

Yeah: to explain the at least do-able travel time in Megas-Tu and ridiculously short travel time in Final Frontier, I like to think that the great barrier causes occasional temporary wormholes to open to it that can be somewhat predicted.
 
I don't know, maybe it's just wishful thinking.. but I'd like to believe we're going to see Ferengi society portrayed more like the awful Handmaid's Tale it is and less like the silly-haha-joke DS9 played it off as.
As much as I would love to see that, I don't think a show aimed at pre-teens is going there, at least not in depth. Thank you for mentioning the black mark though - I hadn't thought about what it could mean.

As to the slavery question, there have, sadly, been many times and places in human history where a man could sell their wives and children.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top