Thanks, you're a gem.I'll certainly give that advice all the thought and consideration that it is due.

Thanks, you're a gem.I'll certainly give that advice all the thought and consideration that it is due.
Actually, we don't know that. We never saw her wake up and say something that suggest she doesn't remember Data and her visit on the D.
It was one of the episodes to me that showed the failure of the prime directive. In a time where good men sit idly by and do nothing, they are just as guilty.
It was one of the episodes to me that showed the failure of the prime directive. In a time where good men sit idly by and do nothing, they are just as guilty.
And just what constitutes the parameters of how those "good men" act? When do they act? When do they not act? Perhaps not acting is the right choice in some situations.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. One merely has to look at the history of colonization in real life to understand that. The prime directive is there for a reason.
Riker said it best when he stated, "our job is not to police the galaxy" And he was right to say that.
She did?Going by this press photo from Mama's Family in 1988, Nikki Cox had the right features to play an alien child on Star Trek: NextGen, even before the Sarjenka make-up and prosthetics were applied:
![]()
Indeed, yes. Especially with Riker's whole "this species is fated to die."It was one of the episodes to me that showed the failure of the prime directive. In a time where good men sit idly by and do nothing, they are just as guilty.
Nikki Cox decided to do some bad plastic S as an adult. Compare the Mama's Family press photo there with a screencap of Sarjenka and it's obvious they are the same girl.She did?I genuinely had to look up who of the two girls in the photo even is Nikki Cox, so apparently her features weren’t all that “alien” after all. At least not to my eyes.
It was one of my favorites then, the same now. It's thoughtful and it's quiet.I haven't watched Pen Pals for easily 15 years, as I did not remember it as a particularly engaging or interesting episode, but I decided to watch it today with my 9-year old son. I have to say, I think it is a really solid episode that I don't think gets much discussion.
The A and B stories are both really quite compelling. The A story has Data revealing that he may or may not have broken the prime directive by answering a hail from a lesser-developed world. The debate around what to do with this, and the role of the Prime Directive in this situation is actually all quite good. There is an ensemble scene in Picard's quarters (it actually looks like he had a spread of food put out in the background, which I had never noticed before) that contains some really good dialogue and has some heat to it.
The B story about Wesley taking on the geological survey team and looking to solve the mystery as to why all the planets in this sector are experiencing geological upheaval is also really quite good. There are some excellent lessons in early leadership on display here, and I like how the crew all treat Wes like an adult. It's actually one of the more realistic and believable (and entertaining) "Wes saves the day" stories.
It's also noteworthy that the A and B stories both weave together rather expertly, which isn't always the case.
Most of all, the dialogue and characterizations all seem spot-on, which was much more rare for TNG S1 and S2 (even though I really like these early seasons).
Add to all this some really brilliant location shooting for the holodeck horseback scenes, and I found myself pleasantly engaged in this episode...certainly FAR more than I ever remembered being.
Now what does her photo as a child have to do with the actress having done some plastic surgery as an adult? And no, personally I don‘t think it‘s all that obvious that it‘s the actress playing Sarjenka in the photo. I do recognize her, as I said, but there‘s nothing obvious about it to me.Nikki Cox decided to do some bad plastic S as an adult. Compare the Mama's Family press photo there with a screencap of Sarjenka and it's obvious they are the same girl.
Nice.If i were mean I'd say there's a Michael Jackson and Nikki Cox bad plastic surgery joke in there, but I'm totally not mean so I didn't say that.
Oh, i can think of worse possible Sarjenkas in 1988 *whistles innocently*
![]()
It’s alright. Humor is a difficult thing to get across in written form. But also, not everyone will laugh about the same things. One person’s “gentle poking” is another person’s inappropriate joke.It's more making fun of bad movies and poking gentle fun at stupid cliched jokes about MJ. Nikki and how bad Tami Erin was in the 1988 Pippi Longstocking movie. I'm a caustic Ebert/Kael style critic not a creep.
Indeed, yes. Especially with Riker's whole "this species is fated to die."
It was deeply frustrating to watch that, and only decide to intervene due to a personal connection. So, no moral compunction, no ethical responsibility, no evaluation of past acts to determine best practices based upon Starfleet's interactions, rather than a one size fits all approach.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.