The Connie in the back looks like it could be an actual TOS 1701 type, but who knows if they'll show either of those two ships in anything but that display screen graphic.
I think, that may be some kind of attachment arm from the starbase ... ? ...
![]()
Either that or it's just the glow from the lighting on the nacelle.
Also, you can see that the rear nacelle pylon is angled.
Yeah bottom of it seems to be the top of that oneStarbase 28 was a name familiar to me. In the first season, there was a discussion about the name of a Federation station. In the subtitles accompanying the overseas editions of the episode "Choose Your Pain", this station was id'ed as Starbase 28.
![]()
Which is nothing like the graphic we see of the starbase from the trailer.
Looking at the graphic and this picture, could the design of Starbase 28 be yet another example of flipping a station around, making it a totally new design, as happen with the orbital office complex from TMP which was flipped to make Regula One for TWOK.
The Admirals at the end of The Trouble with Edward are still wearing the Disco uniforms, though I suspect the reason why they're using the TOS-style uniforms so predominantly in these Short Treks is to justify the expense of making them, given how little they were seen in Disco season 2, they won't be in the third season, and there likely aren't any immediate plans for a Pike spin-off at the moment.Nothing in the first two shorts (and probably this one) ties to Discovery one bit, and they seemed to have abandoned the Discovery uniforms entirely.
Maybe we were supposed to hear "USS Borman"?
Seems a shame nobody thought of that beforehand.Maybe we were supposed to hear "USS Borman"?
They're out on a five year mission with the U.S.S. Boy & the U.S.S. Pink.The USS Bowman is serving in Starfleet contemporaneously with the USS Discovery? Where's the USS Poole and the USS Floyd?![]()
Jupiter Station.The USS Bowman is serving in Starfleet contemporaneously with the USS Discovery? Where's the USS Poole and the USS Floyd?![]()
I can respect your opinion but couldn't disagree more. I am so tired of episodic television where things feel like they don't matter from week to week. That's why I enjoy things like DSC or DS9 in terms of revisiting them is because I want to see how the story unfolds. I love TOS for the episodic story lines but characters keep me coming back, because the focus was often on two or three characters that I was invested in. Contrast with TNG where I was less invested in the characters.These Short Treks have been sometimes good, sometimes bad, but overall, I have enjoyed them a GREAT deal more than DIS itself.
I guess what I'm saying is, I'm an old fart, that wants stand-alone stories again, with different characters in focus every time, and only a looser connection through overarching character arcs.
The "one story devided into several chapters via episodes" works well enough for character based shows like GoT, Netflix stuff, and probably the new Star Wars series. But IMO for Trek I really like the more episodic approach.
I can respect your opinion but couldn't disagree more. I am so tired of episodic television where things feel like they don't matter from week to week. That's why I enjoy things like DSC or DS9 in terms of revisiting them is because I want to see how the story unfolds. I love TOS for the episodic story lines but characters keep me coming back, because the focus was often on two or three characters that I was invested in. Contrast with TNG where I was less invested in the characters.
Episodic TV basically burned me out from when I first started noticing such things, about twenty years ago, or so. It's a little thing, but it adds up to a reminder of "Oh, this doesn't really matter" or "That character was important."You're so tired of episodic television? Outside of some remaining crime procedurals, it's hard to think of any episodic dramas which have been made in the last 10-15 years.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.