• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Just anything

There is always the objective. Star Trek was a phenomenon like never seen before, that resonated on so many levels that it kinda glorified itself very much like a Beethoven symphony in that regard. Yea, not everybody likes Beethoven but that doesn't change anything about how he regarded amongst experts. Not that today's composers should go right out and try to write a Beethoven symphony in that style. He was a reflection of the time he was in.
 
There is always the objective. Star Trek was a phenomenon like never seen before, that resonated on so many levels that it kinda glorified itself very much like a Beethoven symphony in that regard. Yea, not everybody likes Beethoven but that doesn't change anything about how he regarded amongst experts. Not that today's composers should go right out and try to write a Beethoven symphony in that style. He was a reflection of the time he was in.
Then, credit to Discovery for working in the time its in.
 
The big issue with a comparison to a composer or other artist is that their work reflects a single person's vision and talent. Not only are TV and movies a more collaborative process, but Trek has been through many, many hands. The people making it now aren't the same people who were making it 15, 30, or 50 years ago.
 
The big issue with a comparison to a composer or other artist is that their work reflects a single person's vision and talent. Not only are TV and movies a more collaborative process, but Trek has been through many, many hands. The people making it now aren't the same people who were making it 15, 30, or 50 years ago.
From the beginning, it should be noted.
 
The big issue with a comparison to a composer or other artist is that their work reflects a single person's vision and talent. Not only are TV and movies a more collaborative process, but Trek has been through many, many hands. The people making it now aren't the same people who were making it 15, 30, or 50 years ago.

Star Trek is Menudo?
 
I think Gene Roddenberry is sadly underrated. I do believe he WAS Star Trek. His spirit encompassed it all. He was the prism through which others were magnified and shined to create this singularity that is Star Trek, TOS, a miracle of rare design, a gestalt, not an anacronism. It was his vision, dream and details that made it to film and captured God on celluloid. IMO.
 
I think Gene Roddenberry is sadly underrated. I do believe he WAS Star Trek. His spirit encompassed it all. He was the prism through which others were magnified and shined to create this singularity that is Star Trek, TOS, a miracle of rare design, a gestalt, not an anacronism. It was his vision, dream and details that made it to film and captured God on celluloid. IMO.
That can never be replicated. Though, not the God part. That's just weird.
 
I think Gene Roddenberry is sadly underrated. I do believe he WAS Star Trek. His spirit encompassed it all. He was the prism through which others were magnified and shined to create this singularity that is Star Trek, TOS, a miracle of rare design, a gestalt, not an anacronism. It was his vision, dream and details that made it to film and captured God on celluloid. IMO.
He wanted to make money, get laid and tell a good story. He did all three. Trifecta.
 
One of my favorite episodes.

Good A story (the wedding), good B story (the Romulans). Character details on four characters.

You know, I'm not sure why I lumped Data's Day in with those other clunkers. I kinda like Data's Day. I must have been thinking of another episode.
 
The big issue with a comparison to a composer or other artist is that their work reflects a single person's vision and talent. Not only are TV and movies a more collaborative process, but Trek has been through many, many hands. The people making it now aren't the same people who were making it 15, 30, or 50 years ago.

Exactly, and that's what drives me bonkers about people who seem to want to come up with explanations why all the contradictory bits that have happened in the last 50 years of Trek need to be somehow frankensteined together into some form of continuity. That way lies madness.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top