Kind of weird that Domhnall Gleeson was in an episode of Black Mirror a few years ago, in which he played a robot with advanced AI meant to mimic a human, and now he stars in this, playing the human who interacts with a robot with advanced AI meant to mimic a human.
Anyway, I enjoyed the movie, though I do think it falls a bit short of "great".
SPOILER SPACE
DON'T READ FURTHER IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE MOVIE
One thing I think might have made the ending a little better would have been if the final conversation between Caleb and Nathan had had a little more….I don't know….substance? Not sure if that's the word I'm after, and I know this is kind of nitpicky, but I think that convo could have been written a little better, and done more to illuminate their rival perspectives, rather than just explain the logic of the reveal re: the "real test".
I think it would have been interesting if Nathan would have actually said at the end that he thinks the Turing test is crap. He would have said "Yes, she passed this test (which didn't turn out to be the Turing test, in any case), and yes, that means that I've made an amazing breakthrough in AI and will now become a gazillionaire, but that doesn't mean that she actually has consciousness."
That is, in my version, Nathan would have put forth the idea that just because an AI is able to mimic human behavior so well that it fools humans, and it can make us think that it's alive and can even make us fall in love with it, that doesn't mean that it actually has human-like consciousness. He legitimately believes that Ava's just following programming to try to escape, and doesn't have any consciousness of her own. Caleb takes the opposite view.
Then with the ending, with Ava leaving Caleb behind, does that make us, the audience, agree with Nathan that it shows her cold, calculating, machine-like nature, or does it make her all too human?
I saw the movie last night and really enjoyed it. I don't understand why more Twilight Zone-esque science fiction films get more wide releases. The market is obviously there. There were several people in the showing I went to, even though some of them were obnoxious.
I loved the film, but I have a question.
Didn't Caleb program the system to deactivate the doors. So when did that program get overridden, trapping him in the facility?
This. Ava masterfully manipulated Caleb (just as Nathan knew she would), and at the end, showed absolutely no empathy for him, not even traces of it. And all this despite the fact that he seemed to be a good, innocent person, and genuinely cared about her. She got what she wanted (freedom) and never looked back.Yeah but the film said earlier, in a dialogue between Nathan and Caleb, that AI will look at us like we look at Neanderthals. Other dialogue in the film supports this coldness that AI will have for us.
EDIT: There is one loose end, though. Caleb's self-mutilation scene implied that he indeed was a seriously messed-up individual, but what did it mean? Did he honestly at some point thought he might be a robot? If so, what was it that gave him the idea? Alex Garland should have either expanded on this, or cut the scene entirely, because it only raised questions, whilst not doing much for the plot. IMO.
I'll go with a B. All three leads are very good, and I'm definitely excited to see Isaac menace the X-Men, but I can't say the movie really presented any new ideas, or even tried to.
How much time, exactly?I thought the movie explained that well enough, that spending so much time in such a strange environment and seeing the things he did was seriously starting to mess with Caleb's mind.
Nah, it would be way too unimaginative. Although, the idea of an AI administering an unorthodox variant of a Turing test to another AI does sound intriguing.And most of the audience was probably starting to wonder at that point if Caleb was an android as well, so it only made sense that the character was beginning to question it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.