First post? Erm, OK!
The message was obviously "bonk bonk on the head" but there were a lot of really good scenes that I just had to bump it one above completely average, not least the self destruct
And I do have a soft spot for bottle shows
Well, yeah, true. Star Trek often handled controversial subjects with timid subtlety. And this episode was about a subtle as a twenty-pound sledgehammer to the big toe. But even as heavy-handed as it is, I didn't mind the "message" it presented. Standing on the merits of the script, plot, acting, direction, and production, this episode earns a solid six or seven, maybe even an eight. It loses points in my book for being played to death in syndication.A message can be sent firmly, and strongly, without it hitting you on the head or being overly obvious. That's the case here.
Whoever thought of having Gorshin and Lou Antonio chase each other through the same corridor set over and over and over again for what seems like about a whole act, well, their idea of riveting drama and mine don't exist on the same dimensional plane.
I expected him to start doing impressions of Kirk Douglas and Burt Lancaster.This one has little to recommend it. Every time I see the episode, I half-expect Frank Gorshin to break into his Riddler dance and start cackling.
It isn't called "riveting drama"; it's called "padding out the running time."Whoever thought of having Gorshin and Lou Antonio chase each other through the same corridor set over and over and over again for what seems like about a whole act, well, their idea of riveting drama and mine don't exist on the same dimensional plane.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.