• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Christopher Eccleston's Reason for leaving

So basically...Eccleston didn't like being told what to do and no one was listening to his opinion because he refused to kiss ass (perhaps even literally).

:vulcan:

I never warmed to his blue-collar Doctor.

Niether did I actaully it never really fit the backround of his character.

It fit the new background of the character; the shell-shocked, post-Time War Doctor with a survivor's guilt complex, who is healed by Rose and becomes himself again at the end, regenerating into a more "Doctorish" persona. His Doctor had the perfect self-contained arc.
 
Niether did I actaully it never really fit the backround of his character.

The "hotwired a car, kidnapped a child, and never looked back" background?

Yeah the kind of life he said he never got to live in Father's Day.

.... huh? What does the middle-class life he says he'll never be able to live in "Father's Day" have to do with what David cgc said? You said that a working-class persona doesn't fit the Doctor's background, and David simply pointed out that his background is akin to a guy who hotwires a car and runs away -- thus implicitly arguing that a working-class persona is not inconsistent with the Doctor's background.
 
The "hotwired a car, kidnapped a child, and never looked back" background?

Yeah the kind of life he said he never got to live in Father's Day.

.... huh? What does the middle-class life he says he'll never be able to live in "Father's Day" have to do with what David cgc said? You said that a working-class persona doesn't fit the Doctor's background, and David simply pointed out that his background is akin to a guy who hotwires a car and runs away -- thus implicitly arguing that a working-class persona is not inconsistent with the Doctor's background.

I don't think you understand, a car park at 2 in morning is the lifestyle of the working class. And originally he stole the TARDIS and paid for doing it but now we know that it was hte TARDIS who choose him. And no his backround isn't a person who hotwires cars and run away, that wasn't the reason he left Gallifrey. Of course the Time Lords didn't seem to care about him until he let them know where he was.
 
He's clearly very passionate about acting and markedly less so about the business of acting. In any case, he's not coming back and that's really an end of it.

Time will tell. Show him a great script, I'm optimistic he'll strongly consider doing it.
 
Wow, all working class people are car thieves. Who knew...

:rolleyes:

I'm from the working class. Obviously I'm not arguing that.

But while not all working class people are car thieves, what's the percentage of car thieves who are middle class or above? I rather think it's implicit in the very definition of being a car thief that if you're doing it, you're probably doing it because you don't have a "legitimate" source of income.

(No, that doesn't mean that other classes don't have major problems with crime, too -- Enron, Bernie Madoff, and the large-scale theft that was financial speculation and the selling of bad loans that led to the economic melt-down proves this. But of course society treats that kind of white-color crime less seriously than it does typically blue-color crime like auto theft.)
 
Wow, all working class people are car thieves. Who knew...

:rolleyes:

I'm from the working class. Obviously I'm not arguing that.

But while not all working class people are car thieves, what's the percentage of car thieves who are middle class or above? I rather think it's implicit in the very definition of being a car thief that if you're doing it, you're probably doing it because you don't have a "legitimate" source of income.

(No, that doesn't mean that other classes don't have major problems with crime, too -- Enron, Bernie Madoff, and the large-scale theft that was financial speculation and the selling of bad loans that led to the economic melt-down proves this. But of course society treats that kind of white-color crime less seriously than it does typically blue-color crime like auto theft.)
Hmmm...I'd think your car thieves are coming from the "Non-Working" class, not the Working Class. Blue Collar workers work hard for what they have, and only have what they worked for. They don't go around stealing cars to round out their paychecks.
 
Wow, all working class people are car thieves. Who knew...

:rolleyes:

I'm from the working class. Obviously I'm not arguing that.

But while not all working class people are car thieves, what's the percentage of car thieves who are middle class or above? I rather think it's implicit in the very definition of being a car thief that if you're doing it, you're probably doing it because you don't have a "legitimate" source of income.

(No, that doesn't mean that other classes don't have major problems with crime, too -- Enron, Bernie Madoff, and the large-scale theft that was financial speculation and the selling of bad loans that led to the economic melt-down proves this. But of course society treats that kind of white-color crime less seriously than it does typically blue-color crime like auto theft.)

I bet Bernie MAdoff is serving longer than most car thieves will...

And you're assuming people nick cars because they make money on it, which is bullshit, most of the time, in the UK aqt least, it's purley about joy riding, and being poor is not an excuse. And that's spoken as someone who was born working class as well.
 
Wow, all working class people are car thieves. Who knew...

:rolleyes:

I'm from the working class. Obviously I'm not arguing that.

But while not all working class people are car thieves, what's the percentage of car thieves who are middle class or above? I rather think it's implicit in the very definition of being a car thief that if you're doing it, you're probably doing it because you don't have a "legitimate" source of income.

(No, that doesn't mean that other classes don't have major problems with crime, too -- Enron, Bernie Madoff, and the large-scale theft that was financial speculation and the selling of bad loans that led to the economic melt-down proves this. But of course society treats that kind of white-color crime less seriously than it does typically blue-color crime like auto theft.)

I bet Bernie MAdoff is serving longer than most car thieves will...

And you're assuming people nick cars because they make money on it, which is bullshit, most of the time, in the UK aqt least, it's purley about joy riding, and being poor is not an excuse. And that's spoken as someone who was born working class as well.

I would have to agree with you here. I suspect there may be an error in translation given that working class here and working class over the pond describe two different things. Anyway, I'm from a working class background and both my parents live in social/council housing and I've never stolen, nor considered stealing anything, let alone a bloody car!
 
I just feel that I should clarify that my point was the dispute the implication that the Doctor was too classy and staid to be a blue-collar guy, not to show that his criminal history required him to be a blue-collar guy.
 
So basically...Eccleston didn't like being told what to do and no one was listening to his opinion because he refused to kiss ass (perhaps even literally).

:vulcan:

I never warmed to his blue-collar Doctor.

Niether did I actaully it never really fit the backround of his character.

It fit the new background of the character; the shell-shocked, post-Time War Doctor with a survivor's guilt complex, who is healed by Rose and becomes himself again at the end, regenerating into a more "Doctorish" persona. His Doctor had the perfect self-contained arc.

While I've wished we could have gotten more Eccleston, looking back on what we got, this description fits perfectly.
 
I'm not sure what definition of "working class" others using, but the one I'm familiar with uses it as a euphemism for "poor people" and everyone else living below the middle class, thieves and honest men both included.

I just feel that I should clarify that my point was the dispute the implication that the Doctor was too classy and staid to be a blue-collar guy, not to show that his criminal history required him to be a blue-collar guy.

Exactly. There's nothing about the Doctor's history that requires him to be from the upper class.
 
To me, it seems if you're going to use the euphemism "Working Class", it ought to apply to those who do or would like to work (The available pool of workers). It should exclude those who can't or won't work.
 
I'm not sure what definition of "working class" others using, but the one I'm familiar with uses it as a euphemism for "poor people" and everyone else living below the middle class, thieves and honest men both included.

So Lady Christina DeSouza being a thief makes her part of the working class? :eek:
 
I'm not sure what definition of "working class" others using, but the one I'm familiar with uses it as a euphemism for "poor people" and everyone else living below the middle class, thieves and honest men both included.

So Lady Christina DeSouza being a thief makes her part of the working class? :eek:

How would that definition include someone who's from inherited money? She's clearly not living below the middle class.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top