So this is rich. This is a partial excerpt of a quote from Erin O'Toole who was commenting on the allegations raised in the excerpt published from JWR's new book:
Not saying he's wrong, but talk about the pot and kettle. This is the person who painted himself as a "true blue Conservative" in order to beat the more progressive MacKay in the leadership contest, and then as soon as he won... he suddenly wasn't one anymore.
This is what worries me about all the centrist and progressive voters who are tired of Trudeau and look at O'Toole and think that he seems in line with their values. How do they know he will continue to express those values if he manages to pull off a win?
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opi...tooles-position-on-something-just-wait-a-few/
https://nationalpost.com/news/polit...ay-be-a-matter-of-expediency-in-this-election
Not to mention... if Trudeau suddenly had to leave office for whatever reason, you can be reasonably sure that whoever his successor was would continue on generally the same path and reflect generally the same values. Say O'Toole does hold the values he currently claims to... if he manages to win, and then ends up having to leave office for whatever reason, can you honestly say that his successor in the CPC would feel, and govern, the same way?
o'toole doesn't worry me too much - it's the social conservative and other elements within the cpc caucus that I'm concerned about.
pierre poliverre likes his conspricacy theories about socialism and the great resent, another claimed that trudeau wanted to legalise pedaphilla (and o'toole ducked and weaved when asked about her).