You were trying to draw a parallel between Wars and Trek then to Wars and Trek now by arguing WOK had a good opening weekend. It did. However, as pointed out by both Dennis and Guy, opening weekends don't tell the whole story.
Even with its strong opening, WOK didn't even finish in the top five for total take of its year. And, if we assume "of its time" to mean a five year swing (So 79-83), it doesn't even crack the top 20 for total take.
None the less, if the point is to directly compare Trek to Wars, then compare WoK's $78M to Jedi's $252M. That's more than three times as much. I'm pretty sure that suggests Jedi "burred" WoK at the BO.
What I did was this: In one paragraph, I said Star Trek can deliver, and (only) provided a single data point.
In another paragraph, I said there is a gap between Star Wars and Star Trek, including the fact that TFA buried the Kelvin episodes in terms of box office. I asserted that part of the gap was due to studio execution, and another part of the gap was due to market appeal. I never asserted Star Trek was superior to Star Wars at the box office.
If you want some data comparing Star Wars vs Star Trek, here is some interesting information:
Box office: based on these guys, Star Trek is the #6 movie franchise of all time, based on US domestic total box office. Star Wars is #1. If I compare total inflation-adjusted domestic box office, Star Trek (2.4B) has made 38.7% of Star Wars (6.2B). If I compare TFA (936M) to ST:ID (228M), Star Trek did 24%. So like I said, buried. However, based on its ranking at #6, Star Trek can deliver.
Market Appeal: These guys have an interesting take on the fanbase. I wouldn't exactly call it 100% authoritative, but one of their results is they estimate that the ratio of Star Wars fans to Star Trek fans is 3:1. So based on market appeal, Star Wars beats out Star Trek again.
If you want to debate something, debate my assertion that part of the gap of Star Wars vs Star Trek is due to market appeal, and part of the gap is due to studio execution.
Last edited: