So back in the 50s/60s when there was something people thought of as fashionably exciting, they began calling it cool. In the 70s/80s those things began being called hot. In the 90s we'd call it smoking. I seem to recall a move in the 2000s to them being called lit. Now we got people just plain calling them fire. That's so fire.
This is a perishable trend. The next graduation beyond fire is just a bigger fire. So then I suppose the next iteration will be blaze? Maybe inferno? The point is, from there the concept of combustion depreciates into scorched, smoldering, & then ultimately ash, which doesn't seem to hold the same level of potency.
Are we engaged in an ever depreciating use of words for combustibility? & once exhausted where do we go then?
This is a perishable trend. The next graduation beyond fire is just a bigger fire. So then I suppose the next iteration will be blaze? Maybe inferno? The point is, from there the concept of combustion depreciates into scorched, smoldering, & then ultimately ash, which doesn't seem to hold the same level of potency.
Are we engaged in an ever depreciating use of words for combustibility? & once exhausted where do we go then?
