I don't think it's about the mythos really. When TV executives try and come up with the "next GOT" it means plots that focus on conflict between different political factions and "sudden" deaths for shock value.
It's as if the producers saw how popular The Witcher was getting, both books and games, that they wanted to take it on, yet not actually care about adapting the works. They just wanted a popular fantasy franchise they could mould and use a popular name. From what I understand, The Witcher as an IP draws heavily from eastern-European folklore, Sapowski being Polish, while GoT is more of a standardized high-fantasy setting.
Yes, about The Witcher's setting. A lot of the story feels as if it is a D&D adventure and you are following the party as the events of the world happen around them.
As for GoT, I realize it's influenced by European history, but the show at least still has the feel of something that's influenced by western society, and I feel that's what the Witcher's producers were aiming to recapture, and at the expense of everything else.
A lot of the setting seems to be very Eastern European, but I am not sure if there are specific monsters from the region's cultures.
They are. Things like the striga and kikimora are from Slavic traditions.
I mean, if you squint your eyes, you can't really tell the difference
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.