• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Right Stuff - 2020

My question, ever since I first heard of it, is "Why?"

My only other observation is that in my experience, if the National Geographic Society is involved, the result is either prurient, or boring, or usually both. Consider Cousteau, for example. David Wolper's The Undersea World of Jacques Cousteau was far better than anything Cousteau did with the National Geographic Society.

(When I was a child, a well-meaning, well-heeled relative [the same one who gave me three years of Highlights for Children when I would have been much happier with Popular Science] gave me a gift membership in the National Geographic Society for a year or two. The magazines sat ignored. By contrast, I read Smithsonian cover-to-cover every month, and have been for decades.)
 
One show about 1950s/60s boys and their rockets wasn't enough? :p

I liked First Man, and have been meaning to see Apollo 13 again, but how much of this space race nostalgia do we really need?!
 
One show about 1950s/60s boys and their rockets wasn't enough? :p

I liked First Man, and have been meaning to see Apollo 13 again, but how much of this space race nostalgia do we really need?!
Some of us old farts enjoy the nostalgia. We lived through it. It is our history. Besides, the movie couldn't cover all of Wolfe's book. There are more stories than were shown in the movie, about a third of which was devoted to Chuck Yeager.
 
I watched episode 1 last night. It is OK. Has not grabbed me like the film did right away. No mention of Chuck Yeager yet lol. Was that even in the book? Or was the Yeager part added for screenplay?
 
I watched episode 1 last night. It is OK. Has not grabbed me like the film did right away. No mention of Chuck Yeager yet lol. Was that even in the book? Or was the Yeager part added for screenplay?

Yeager was definitely in the book - pretty much opened and closed with him (from the X-1 to the F-104?).
 
I watched episode 1 last night. It is OK. Has not grabbed me like the film did right away. No mention of Chuck Yeager yet lol. Was that even in the book? Or was the Yeager part added for screenplay?
I watched the first episodes and the movie had much more of a sense of swashbuckling high adventure. So far the series seems like a prime time TV family drama set on a space program background.
 
Finished episode 2. I’ll continue, but it’s not something I’m counting down the minutes for.
 
I watched the first episodes and the movie had much more of a sense of swashbuckling high adventure. So far the series seems like a prime time TV family drama set on a space program background.

so they could have called it "Away" if the name hadn't been taken at already.
 
Yeager was definitely in the book - pretty much opened and closed with him (from the X-1 to the F-104?).
I think the producers said in interviews that they're not covering the X-programme out at Edwards and if the show is successful enough they plan to go all the way to the Apollo era, well past the scope of Wolfe's book.
 
For most astronauts, it's at most two weeks of flight after years of training and office politics.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top