Has it occured to anyone that Section 31 might be the organization responsible for the Temporal Cold War in the future?
At the very least, one of the main factions.
I really hope Section 31 is lllloooonnngg gone by the 31st century.
Has it occured to anyone that Section 31 might be the organization responsible for the Temporal Cold War in the future?
At the very least, one of the main factions.
If someone in the know at NASA knew that the CIA was in possession of spore drive technology, it's likely they'd at least put out some feelers.If astronauts on a moon lander were stuck on the moon with no way to get back to Earth, would the CIA be called in to help them?
I'm not sure why this requirement for spore drive use gets repeated. It is very clearly stated in DSC that both Ripper and the genetic enhancements to Stamets were alternative methods of using the spore drive because the computer system on their 2260s era starship could only make calculations fast enough for small jumps. The spore drive is not the slipstream drive from Andromeda.Realistically the only downside I see to the spore drive is it cannot be used en masse without tons of people either being forcibly genetically modified like Stamets, or outright enslaved like Kwejian or tardigrades.
I mean there's no talk about this at all in regards to the infinitely advanced 32nd century computers. Why do they need Book? Maybe it's been retconned?If someone in the know at NASA knew that the CIA was in possession of spore drive technology, it's likely they'd at least put out some feelers.
I'm not sure why this requirement for spore drive use gets repeated. It is very clearly stated in DSC that both Ripper and the genetic enhancements to Stamets were alternative methods of using the spore drive because the computer system on their 2260s era starship could only make calculations fast enough for small jumps. The spore drive is not the slipstream drive from Andromeda.
As far as Voyager is concerned, they've had a century of computer enhancements and at least two paradigm shifts in computer processing capability -- first from duotronic to isolinear, and then from that to bio-neural circuitry. Surely the spore drive can be deployed on Starfleet ships giving them a reasonable range capability -- and certainly shortening Voyager's trip greatly -- without genetic modifications to anyone or involving the enslavement of sentient space-borne lifeforms.
Honestly, I like this theory. As far as fan theories go it makes enough sense while still be quite headache inducing, largely because time travel sucks.I kept expecting them to show that the spore drive was somehow killing sentient creatures in the spore network, was surprised when they didn’t. That would have been a more Starfleet reason to bury it.
But one thing you could also consider. What if section 31 never did stop using it? That’s how they seem to easy get anywhere they want. And they buried it because they knew any official research would inevitably wind up in Romulan hands too who would use it more aggressively.
One other theory is time travelers ensured Voyager could not be rescued because the universe depended on what they did in Endgame. Why do you think Relativity never cleaned all that up? Uploading that virus to the Queen is a cornerstone event of history. Maybe the Borg originally won and then time travelers went to work and puzzled together the only timeline where the Borg did not win was the one where Voyager gets home exactly the way they did.
The time travelers couldn’t stop Discovery from getting spore drive because then Control wins, that was another cornerstone event. But they needed it to disappear directly after.
The REAL reason why Starfleet didn't try rescuing Voyager using the Spore Drive is that the drive and the show that introduced said drive didn't exist when Star Trek: Voyager was made.
True...and?The REAL reason why Starfleet didn't try rescuing Voyager using the Spore Drive is that the drive and the show that introduced said drive didn't exist when Star Trek: Voyager was made.
Yeah. Insta-travel isn't all that interesting: you want a solid sphere of influence, as you can't control a cloud of influence created by spot visits to really distant locations. Spore travel would automatically mean overextending, unless Starfleet somehow managed to build millions if not billions of spore ships in a very short time. Special operations applications might abound, but extensive research would be the antithesis of that.
Yet the weaponizing prospects are well beyond Armageddon scale, even if one only considers the universe-hopping and not the whole universe-burning thing.
If someone in the know at NASA knew that the CIA was in possession of spore drive technology, it's likely they'd at least put out some feelers.
I'm not sure why this requirement for spore drive use gets repeated. It is very clearly stated in DSC that both Ripper and the genetic enhancements to Stamets were alternative methods of using the spore drive because the computer system on their 2260s era starship could only make calculations fast enough for small jumps. The spore drive is not the slipstream drive from Andromeda.
As far as Voyager is concerned, they've had a century of computer enhancements and at least two paradigm shifts in computer processing capability -- first from duotronic to isolinear, and then from that to bio-neural circuitry. Surely the spore drive can be deployed on Starfleet ships giving them a reasonable range capability -- and certainly shortening Voyager's trip greatly -- without genetic modifications to anyone or involving the enslavement of sentient space-borne lifeforms.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.