The First Poster for INTO DARKNESS Has Just Been Revealed...
- Thread starter cooleddie74
- Start date
I just saw yours, Methos.
It's a damn sight better than this one, fake or not.
It's a damn sight better than this one, fake or not.
I thought it was a fake, right off the bat, but I could be wrong. If this is what the poster really looks like, then I think something went awry. Also, it reminds me too much of images like this:
FWIW
Awesome, there's a photoshop thread! Nice, and you've done some nice work there. I don't venture into the General Discussion section, but that's going to change now.
^ Then gimme my lens flares back. 
I haven't been able to find the comment in question. Have you a link you can post?Nope.
This was posted in the TrekMovie.com comments right after the name was revealed.
Your avatar is missing lens flare, Spock/Uhura...
You need something like my previous avatar:
Now that's some groovy-ass flare, baby.
You need something like my previous avatar:
Now that's some groovy-ass flare, baby.
Thanks for that, ralph.
Guess that settles the colon controversy once and for all. Show's over, laddies...nothin' more to see here.
Guess that settles the colon controversy once and for all. Show's over, laddies...nothin' more to see here.
^ It sure is, Eddie. It's pretty cool.
- The lens flarey avatar, I mean. I'll work to add more flares to mine in the future. Promise. 
- The lens flarey avatar, I mean.
I'll work to add more flares to mine in the future. Promise. 
Except it's still a noun, unless that's interpreted as an imperative: "Star, trek into darkness!" It's just a noun that has a prepositional phrase added to it.
^ It sure is, Eddie. It's pretty cool.
- The lens flarey avatar, I mean.
Thanks! I had help from our very own J. Allen. Without his skills there'd be no "nuCarl Spock."
^ It sure is, Eddie. It's pretty cool.
- The lens flarey avatar, I mean.
Thanks! I had help from our very own J. Allen. Without his skills there'd be no "nuCarl Spock."
Carl Spock? Where is he?
Lonnnnng story.
You weren't around when the legend of Carl Spock was the rage. Dang. I don't know where to begin, really. It's complicated...and very weird.
<------ This is Carl, by the way. The original.
You weren't around when the legend of Carl Spock was the rage. Dang. I don't know where to begin, really. It's complicated...and very weird.
<------ This is Carl, by the way. The original.
I star trek into darkness.
He/she/it star treks into darkness.
We star trek into darkness.
They star trek into darkness.
Now it's a verb.
@ cooleddie I'm just a lowly Lieutenant Commander, Sir Admiral. So I'll accept that the information is classified. 
I star trek into darkness.
He/she/it star treks into darkness.
We star trek into darkness.
They star trek into darkness.
Now it's a verb.
In those sentences, yes. But "Star trek into darkness" has no subject, so it's not a sentence with a verb -- again, unless it's an imperative and the implied subject is the listener. And "Star" could not be the subject with that form of the word "trek" and with no comma. If it were "Star treks into darkness" or "Star trekking into darkness" or "Star trekked into darkness," then it would be a verb with "Star" as the subject, but not in the form "Star trek into darkness."
By analogy, think of Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea or Journey to the Center of the Earth. "Voyage" and "Journey" aren't verbs in those titles, but nouns. They aren't imperatives telling the audience to voyage or journey to those places; they're simply a description of the events being depicted in the stories. This is a movie about a voyage to the bottom of the sea, this is a book about a journey to the center of the earth. And equivalently, the show Gene Roddenberry created is a television series about a star trek -- i.e. a long, arduous journey in space -- while this movie is depicting a star trek into darkness -- i.e. a long, arduous space journey that goes somewhere dark. (Like, maybe, space?)
Similar threads
