Thinking about the half-aliens we meet in Star Trek and wondering about the biological implications.
For one thing, let's ignore the facts of actual science which would have us believe that a human is more closely related to an oak tree than to an animal from another planet. We see that in Star Trek, when a human and an alien fall in love, there's a good chance they might make a halfbreed baby. But let us consider the characteristics of the child.
Spock, as a Human-Vulcan, seems to most observers to be indistinguishable form Vulcans. Only Harry Mudd seems to recognize he looks more human than do most Vulcans. Keylar and B'Lana Torres both look as Klingon as many Klingons do. Sure, their ridges are a little more subtle, but then, so were General Chang's and we have no reason to assume he was half human. I don't know enough about Voyager to recall about the Wildman kid, someone can fill me in. And I guess Tom Paris and Torres had a baby too? It seems to me that human-alien hybrids tend to appear very much like their alien parent rather than the human one.
So here's the idea that hopped into my brain: in general, the hybrids are human/alien, never really alien/alien (Tora Ziyal I'll get to in a moment). So my thought is that perhaps being able to blend genomes with aliens is a peculiarly human trait. Humans, and perhaps some especially human-like aliens, like Bajorans, are rare in their ability to create viable children with alien species. And probably not with all alien species. Just a handful which happen to be close enough. So it's some factor in the human genome that allows the hybridization. A factor that is only found in very few species here and there.
This might also explain why the Talos IV report Kirk and Mendez review describes Spock as "half-Vulcan" without specifying the other half. Perhaps in the Federation, humans are the only ones who could hybridize (the is the 23rd Century UFP, remember) and so there would be no need to specify the other half is human because only humans could possibly be half-something.
I admit I haven't been thinking this through for very long, so perhaps I'm missing some relevant evidence. And I never got to be a big fan of Voyager or Enterprise so maybe I'm missing some critical piece. But what do you think?
Discuss.
--Alex
For one thing, let's ignore the facts of actual science which would have us believe that a human is more closely related to an oak tree than to an animal from another planet. We see that in Star Trek, when a human and an alien fall in love, there's a good chance they might make a halfbreed baby. But let us consider the characteristics of the child.
Spock, as a Human-Vulcan, seems to most observers to be indistinguishable form Vulcans. Only Harry Mudd seems to recognize he looks more human than do most Vulcans. Keylar and B'Lana Torres both look as Klingon as many Klingons do. Sure, their ridges are a little more subtle, but then, so were General Chang's and we have no reason to assume he was half human. I don't know enough about Voyager to recall about the Wildman kid, someone can fill me in. And I guess Tom Paris and Torres had a baby too? It seems to me that human-alien hybrids tend to appear very much like their alien parent rather than the human one.
So here's the idea that hopped into my brain: in general, the hybrids are human/alien, never really alien/alien (Tora Ziyal I'll get to in a moment). So my thought is that perhaps being able to blend genomes with aliens is a peculiarly human trait. Humans, and perhaps some especially human-like aliens, like Bajorans, are rare in their ability to create viable children with alien species. And probably not with all alien species. Just a handful which happen to be close enough. So it's some factor in the human genome that allows the hybridization. A factor that is only found in very few species here and there.
This might also explain why the Talos IV report Kirk and Mendez review describes Spock as "half-Vulcan" without specifying the other half. Perhaps in the Federation, humans are the only ones who could hybridize (the is the 23rd Century UFP, remember) and so there would be no need to specify the other half is human because only humans could possibly be half-something.
I admit I haven't been thinking this through for very long, so perhaps I'm missing some relevant evidence. And I never got to be a big fan of Voyager or Enterprise so maybe I'm missing some critical piece. But what do you think?
Discuss.
--Alex