• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Strangers from the Sky by Margaret Wander Bonanno - a look back

Procutus

Admiral
Admiral
I had forgotten what a really good book this was.

This novel came up in discussion in a thread about TMP, as part of the narrative takes place well after the events of the first movie. I remembered it fondly and since I still own a copy, I decided to pull it out and read it again.

In the 38 years since Strangers was published, the history of events prior to TOS has been filled in by TNG and everything else that came after it. But in 1987, with only the original show and four movies, there was little to form the basis of that history. Using a couple of key events from the excellent Star Trek Spaceflight Chronology by Fred and Stan Goldstein as anchor points for the story, Bonanno created a speculative and very thought-provoking tale that examined the first contact that happened between humans and Vulcans - two decades before the ‘official’ historically recorded encounter occurred.

And wouldn’t you know it, Kirk and Company inadvertently become involved with those events.

Despite the fact that two of the key historical events cited from the Goldstein book are no longer valid, the rest of the tale holds up remarkably well within the context of current Trek canon (back then, first contact with Vulcans was not connected to Cochrane’s FTL flight). For me, I felt the characterization was very well done, both with the Enterprise crew and the new characters introduced. The novel is divided into two main sections; the first part centers mainly on Kirk, Spock & McCoy, but the second part takes place at the very beginning of the five year mission - and we get to know the characters of Gary Mitchell, Elizabeth Dehner and Lee Kelso far better than we did in the single episode that introduced them.

To anyone who hasn’t already read this remarkably well-crafted novel, I heartily recommend it. It stands well on its own merit, as well as demonstrating just how much the Star Trek universe has grown since its publication.
 
Read this for the first time myself a couple years ago. Pretty good book, and I agree it still holds up even after Trek canon has supplanted much of it. One issue I will bring up is the details of 21st century Earth depicted in the novel are a bit silly, particularly the command authority the military characters answer to being a melding of the Pentagon and Kremlin called "PentaKrem." I dunno why, but that made me groan every time I read it.

But yeah, Strangers From the Sky is easily one of those novels along with Final Frontier and Federation that are still worth checking out even if they're no longer consistent with the franchise's established canon.
 
I have to agree with you that the way the 21st century is depicted is definitely off, considering we are talking about a period of time that is now only 20 years removed from our own. I've often thought that trying to predict the near-future in science-fiction is probably more difficult that looking ahead by centuries.

But the reactions to aliens arriving unannounced is probably right on target, now or in 2045.
 
This was an early favorite Star Trek novel of mine, and MWB was always kind & gracious to her fans. She is missed.

details of 21st century Earth depicted in the novel are a bit silly, particularly the command authority the military characters answer to being a melding of the Pentagon and Kremlin called "PentaKrem."
Putin practically has control of the Pentagon in 2025, so maybe not so silly.
 
I remember enjoying this one a lot when it first came out, even though I had not especially enjoyed Dwellers in the Crucible, Bonanno's previous ST novel. It seems like a lot of really interesting and diverse novels came out during those few years just prior to TNG when Pocket was publishing six or more novels a year. I may have reread this one once at some point, but it's been years ago.
I do remember really liking the segments of the novel that were set before "Where No Man has Gone Before" and the chance it gave us to see more of Gary Mitchell and Dr. Piper, since both of those characters had been sidelined in the previous "giant" novel, Enterprise: The First Adventure. (And the inconsistencies between the two novels were really hard to work out in my mind.)
I think this may also have been the first time that an ST novel had extended narratives in two (actually, three) separate time periods rather than just brief flash-back sequences.

I'd definitely recommend this novel to any "newer" fans who are curious about what Star Trek fiction was like in the time before there were trillions of novels and bajillions of hours of television and movies. (Those numbers are slightly exaggerated, I'll admit!)
 
Putin practically has control of the Pentagon in 2025, so maybe not so silly.
The point I was making is that the two are completely different types of authority centers, making it unlikely they would be merged regardless the state of international relations. IE, the Pentagon is the base of the headquarters of the US military while the Kremlin is the seat of Russia's government. Even if the two countries were to merge, something like "White Kremlin" or a merger between Pentagon and whatever Russia's primary military headquarters is called would make far more sense then "PentaKrem."
 

I do remember really liking the segments of the novel that were set before "Where No Man has Gone Before" and the chance it gave us to see more of Gary Mitchell and Dr. Piper, since both of those characters had been sidelined in the previous "giant" novel, Enterprise: The First Adventure. (And the inconsistencies between the two novels were really hard to work out in my mind.)

I think you meant to say Dr. Dehner, not Piper. I think Piper got name-dropped in Strangers but he didn't appear as a character. I too, liked seeing them developed more as characters, as well as Lee Kelso, who came across as very likeable. All the more poignant when you realized those three characters only had a short time to live following those events.
 
I really like this novel alot the story has held up well.I had to buy a second copy because I wore out the first paperback I had from the 1980s.The parts with Gary and Dr. Dehner being part of Kirk's crew and being part of the Vulcans first contact and helping saving the day I really liked alot.
 
Gary Mitchell is one of my favorite characters of all time. Anything pre-Where-no-man is always appreciated.

Funnily enough, i was playing around on grok (its great at scripts and fanfic) after I had been exploring short stories and comics with mitchell, and after i had it explaining some of the crossovers that aren't summarized well on line, so when it wrote my next "story" for shits and giggles, it started incorporating mitchell, kelso, piper and alden into the crew and setting it in "year zero" lol. Interesting stuff.
 
To anyone who hasn’t already read this remarkably well-crafted novel, I heartily recommend it. It stands well on its own merit, as well as demonstrating just how much the Star Trek universe has grown since its publication.

This book would be the one Trek novel I have reread most often.

It is also worth mentioning that, even though heavily abridged (only 90mins for a "giant" novel), the audio book of SftS is excellent. Read by George Takei (who does an amazing Southern female accent for Melody Sawyer) and Leonard Nimoy as "the voice of Spock".

Also, it is obvious that the script for the "Enterprise" episode was at least partly-inspired by SftS. In another version of "history doesn't record what actually happened...", T'Pol tells Archer and Tucker a (perhaps true First Contact) story about her great-grandmother and two other Vulcans, who crash landed in a small Pennsylvania town in the year 1957.
 
I remember this one very well.
Very atmospheric and an interesting story.I remember being particularly sad about Sawyers revealed fate.
 
Also, it is obvious that the script for the "Enterprise" episode was at least partly-inspired by SftS. In another version of "history doesn't record what actually happened...", T'Pol tells Archer and Tucker a (perhaps true First Contact) story about her great-grandmother and two other Vulcans, who crash landed in a small Pennsylvania town in the year 1957.

I don't think that's obvious at all. As I've pointed out many times before, different writers coincidentally come up with parallel ideas all the time, especially when they're working on the same series with the same pool of concepts. Since both TOS and ENT had Vulcan lead characters, it's all but inevitable that if they independently did "secret first contact" stories, they'd both choose Vulcans as the aliens in question.

And with, by now, nearly a thousand Trek episodes and films and a comparable number of books and comics, it's statistically inevitable that there would be multiple instances of recurring concepts by pure chance alone. So it's profoundly unwise to jump to the conclusion that similarity "proves" deliberate copying. The opposite is usually the case, because writers try very hard not to copy each other, but accidental similarities slip through all the time despite our best efforts. Deliberate homages do happen, but one should never assume a similarity is an homage, not unless the writers have specifically said it was.
 
Not to pile on you Therin, but I have to agree with Christopher on this. I would think if Carbon Creek was really meant to be an homage or was inspired by Strangers From the Sky there would have been more specific story or character elements taken from the book beyond the most basic concept, which is really not so unique of a concept that two different writers couldn't have come up with it completely independently.
 
The stuff flashing on Spock's screens, yes. But we mustn't forget the Epsilon 9 scene, with the offscreen voice rattling off orders to ships, citing names and numbers exactly matching those listed in the SFTM.
 
The stuff flashing on Spock's screens, yes. But we mustn't forget the Epsilon 9 scene, with the offscreen voice rattling off orders to ships, citing names and numbers exactly matching those listed in the SFTM.

Same answer. It wasn't a tribute, it was just taking advantage of stuff other people already made up so they didn't have to. For foreground material, stuff that's actually noticeable to the audience and plot-relevant, they would've created their own, but for this kind of background stuff -- things that would be peripherally glimpsed or heard for just a few seconds and that 99% of the film's audience would never consciously register as anything but ambience -- they just grab what's convenient. Remember, back then, there was very little Star Trek reference material to draw on. When it came to starship blueprints and names, the SFTM was pretty much the only game in town.

It's the exact same thing that happens with modern Trek productions where they grab something off Memory Alpha, not because they're paying loving homage to the source material, but because they're working on a deadline and just grab whatever they can find that fits the bill. Not everything is an Easter egg or a fannish tribute. When something is the standard reference for a work of fiction, then someone whose job is to create something in that universe will use it as a research tool. In the late 1970s, the definitive Trek references were The Making of Star Trek, the Concordance, and FJ's stuff. You can see their influence on a great deal of Trek fiction in the '70s and '80s, including some canon works. (For instance, TOS & TAS used various different terms for Vulcan telepathy, only using "meld" twice, both in early season 3; but TMoST used "meld" and thus it became standardized.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top