• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Mythbusters - "Waterslide Wipeout"

Grade episode

  • Excellent

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Good

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • Average

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • Bad

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Terrible

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

Trekker4747

Boldly going...
Premium Member
Can making only right turns save you gas?

Jamie and Adam re-create the YouTube viralvideo of a slip-'n'-slide long-distance stunt.
 
The YouTube video in question:




So far this episode has been more enjoyable than others this season, though I have missed the last two or three.


When I posted this video, halfway through the episode, there were:
1,179,798 hits

When the episode ended, there were:
THE SAME


Seems not too many people were interested in checking out the video.
 
Last edited:
Then you shouldn't be saying there's little interest when you're only going off of the view counts of one video.
 
Waterslide: The YouTube video looks very fake. The trajectory doesn't look real -- I figured it was digitally altered or simulated, which of course it was. Also, the pool was too shallow; had that really happened, he probably would've broken his legs or something. So it was pretty clearly a fake just from looking at it. And even if that distance could be achieved in theory, how would they have safely "dialed it in?"

I loved it when Adam lost that roll of duct tape down the ramp. So that's one thing duct tape can't do: hit the brakes. And another thing it can't do: float.

I find it amusing that the way they measured flight distances of dozens of meters was by using a GPS device getting data from a satellite over 35,000 kilometers away. It seems overcomplicated. Though GPS is so ubiquitous that it's become one of the simplest ways to measure location and distance. It's not something we really think about, how wild that is.


Right vs. left turns: The problem with their initial test was that they used the same route each time. It seems to me that the benefit of a right-turns-only policy would be cumulative; on some routes you'd use more gas going only right, but your savings on other routes would outweigh that. Also they didn't take traffic into account sufficiently. I've only been driving for two and a half years, but I've come to loathe making left turns into traffic (though I'm talking about coming out of a side street or parking lot and turning onto a busy street, not being on a busy street and waiting for oncoming traffic to clear before you turn onto a different one). There have been times on busy streets where I've gotten so frustrated waiting for a chance to turn left that I've just given up, gone right, and driven blocks out of my way to find a place I could turn into a parking lot on the left side of the street, turn around, then make a right turn back into the street. (These were cases where doing three right turns around a block wouldn't work.) At least on intersections with traffic lights, you have a controlled opportunity to turn, eventually. But if you're coming out of a side street or parking lot with no traffic light, it can take forever to get a shot to turn left. So in some cases, having a traffic light to deal with is actually preferable.

Anyway, their van test confirmed my expectations, that it would make more difference with a range of different traffic/route scenarios as opposed to the same one over and over.

But doesn't going down Lombard Street constitute making a bunch of left turns, alternating with right ones? Well, technically, but not for the purposes of the myth, I guess, because it doesn't affect idling time.

Wow, how cool would it be to just be walking down a street and have Kari Byron come up to you and randomly give you a package as part of a myth test in progress? I wouldn't have been as calm as that guy, that's for sure.
 
I had heard that the waterslide video was fake shortly after it was first released, as a matter of fact, I believe the creators of it were fairly open about the video being faked/altered.
 
I knew the video was fake. Way too much air time and distance, and even if you calculated math and had practice dummies, there's no wa yto gurantee hitting a small pool like that -- missing it would mean certain death.
 
Yeah, this wasn't a myth that was particularly essential or difficult to bust. But it was a fun build. And they got to do something grandiose and "extreme" that, for once, didn't require high explosives or the destruction of automobiles.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top