The only time Bruce Geller gave any explanation as to what the IMF was, was in an interview he gave at the beginning of the first season where he called the IMF, "a private group, not a government group. It always works on the right side. It takes on delicate assignments for the government or anyone. Such as if the CIA doesn't want to be directly involved in a case. . . Sometimes, because of circumstances, the FBI, New York police, or California sheriffs can't enter into a situation - then they hire this group. The impossibility of the challenge enters into it. . . It's very difficult to define what they are because their missions have a broad scope - sometimes it's spying, sometimes detective work."
What I find interesting is that Leonard Nimoy was approached to direct the movie. If one looks at the timeline, Paramount was hoping to have 'M:I' in theaters in the summer of 1986; 'The Voyage Home' premiered in November 1986. If Nimoy had chosen to direct 'M:I', then he would have been unavailable to write/direct/act 'The Voyage Home.' If that's the case, what does Paramount do? Who do they turn to, to work on 'The Voyage Home'? Do they go back to Nicholas Meyers or do they give William Shatner his 'favored nations' clause and have him write/direct the movie? Does Nimoy only appear in a glorified cameo as Spock at the beginning/end of the movie and does Robin Curtis as Saavik take his place. Is it even the same movie that Nimoy proposed?I also kind of regret that that '80s feature film revival didn't happen.
Okay, let's say Paramount decides to bump 'M:I' to summer 1987-1988 - are they going to be willing to fund an action/adventure/caper movie with tv stars in their late-50s/early-60s?
The DC comics run between Treks II and III gave a kind of glimpse into what that could have looked like, although in a grander, comic book plotted way. I was never tied to the notion Spock necessarily being the key to Trek's success, so I was fine with the possibility of new blood going forward, until Nimoy decided he wanted back in and then the status quo had to be restored.Considering that you were the one who brought up that it would've been contemporaneous with the original-cast Star Trek movies, I find that a very strange question. The M:I cast was in the same age range as the TOS cast, and even the oldest, Graves, was 6 years younger than Kelley or Doohan.
Indeed, M:I lends itself more easily than ST to introducing new cast members, so a movie could've easily featured returning original cast members while also phasing in a couple of new young leads (which is what Harve Bennett tried to do with Saavik and David, though it didn't take).
In a way, that's similar to what DePalma's M:I did, starting with Ethan Hunt as a junior member as an established team and then phasing out the old team, although what I'm suggesting would've been nowhere near as drastic a transition.
An M:I movie could've been in the vein of The Sting or Sneakers.
Much like, to me, Disney's The Black Hole could have been a Lost in Space movie with some character name changes and some tweaks.
I always cite Sneakers as my favourite MI movieSneakers was a perfect M:I movie, and it was terrific. It was one practically in every way but name.
To be honest, the Space Family Robinson aspect was fairly eroded by the time they got to the end of the first year and by the third, they were just a family having various adventures in space. And they ran into space light houses and colonies that were well beyond the capabilities of 1997ish. Irwin Allen didn't care about that. Also, they did establish in the first couple of episode that the hyperdrive they experience at the climax of the first episode could have launched them through space and time into any part of the galaxy. Smith also thought the giant derelict ship was from Earth, even if the Robinson's didn't.Hmm, I dunno. Lost in Space was basically a sci-fi reimagining of The Swiss Family Robinson, while The Black Hole was basically a sci-fi reimagining of Disney's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea.
More to the point, the Jupiter 2 was humanity's first attempt at an interstellar colony ship, so it would be inconsistent to posit that a huge ship like the Cygnus could've existed 20 years before it. I don't see any way to reconcile TBH's 2130 setting with LiS's 1990s setting.
Except Maureen didn't have a telepathic link with the Robot.Kate Macrae could easily be retooled as Maureen
Remove Durant and replace him with the kids and you have your characters.
Yes. And I've always wondered why there was a flurry of new scores written at the end of Lost in Space's third season ("Space Beauty," "The Great Vegetable Rebellion," "Junkyard in Space").Lost in Space reused John Williams' scores so often they became the signature of the show, well into the third season - even though plenty of other composers worked on it.
Yes. And I've always wondered why there was a flurry of new scores written at the end of Lost in Space's third season ("Space Beauty," "The Great Vegetable Rebellion," "Junkyard in Space").
Did one of the music unions finally say "Enough Already" to re-using Williams' scores so much? (It was unusual for a 1960s TV series to get multiple original scores at the end of a season.)
Don't remove Durant. Have Will take his role with identical results and waste him at the halfway point. Then eliminate Smith and Harry Booth the same explosive way in turn. This is not your grampa's LOST IN SPACE, this is LOST IN SPACE with the guts to sideline two talented actors while eliminating their ultra-annoying characters' show-hogging tendencies once and for all. Make it canon with extra dramatic glue. Also, ask Angela Cartwright if she'd like to play the newly-voiced Maximilian for empowering robotic agency while Marta Kristen voices Old Bobbi.I was more thinking of the characters, they had Dan Holland and Charlie Pizer, who resembled John and Don in personality and even somewhat in appearance. Kate Macrae could easily be retooled as Maureen, and Harry Booth had some pretty clear traits shared by Dr. Smith. Remove Durant and replace him with the kids and you have your characters. And they had a robot.
You won't have to, if my 1992 Variety back issue obits are to be believed.I'm not gonna tell Anthony Perkins he's out of a job.
That's easily written out, I'm not saying it is a scene for scene LIS episode, but there's enough about that that would make it work. The ESP thing was a goofy 70's touch that was useful but not vital to the story.Except Maureen didn't have a telepathic link with the Robot.
Well that depends on when in the series you mean. The first 5 episodes were very dark for 60's family TV. Smith programmed the robot to murder everyone but Don - even the kids. The show was frequently scary in the first season. Yes, CBS decided that's not what they wanted for this series, but Irwin was fine with dark and chilling programming. Death was no stranger to the Irwin Allen Quartet of SF (the Voyage body count was incredibly high). But, again, the story thrust of The Black Hole was a lone spaceship finding a large, long thought destroyed Earth ship poised at the edge of a black hole. The crew, with their bravado spewing coward friend and their robot, discover the captain is a barking mad genius who wants to enter black hole to see what's on the other side. He has an even robotoid assistant. Action and betrayal ensue and the crew gets off the ship before it blows but finds themselves drawn into the black hole.But seriously, the movie's tone is a bit dark for LiS, what with the lobotomized crew and the other scary stuff. The Black Hole was one of Disney's attempts to break out of its kids'-movie reputation and do something more edgy and adult. (They eventually created the Touchstone imprint for such films when they proved unable to escape the stigma of the Disney name.) There's also the fact that Harry is killed and the Palomino is destroyed. So you'd have to change a lot to make it fit LiS, in which case it isn't really the same story.
Irwin Allen did that with Voyage and Land of the Giants also. He held back a lot of new music until the end of the season for those shows. Voyage had new music for 6 of the last 7 episodes of the series. Unlike the first season of LIS and Voyage which blow that wad up front because they needed music to start with. It's just odd that when LIS and Voyage had a look of being on austerity, Irwin had money enough to spring for new scores.Yes. And I've always wondered why there was a flurry of new scores written at the end of Lost in Space's third season ("Space Beauty," "The Great Vegetable Rebellion," "Junkyard in Space").
Did one of the music unions finally say "Enough Already" to re-using Williams' scores so much? (It was unusual for a 1960s TV series to get multiple original scores at the end of a season.)
Well that depends on when in the series you mean. The first 5 episodes were very dark for 60's family TV. Smith programmed the robot to murder everyone but Don - even the kids.
There are enough qualities about the basic story and the characters to remind me of the series enough to say "this would work as a LIS movie with some rewriting."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.