See what I did there? I said you would lose and that triggered members to vote the other way. You're welcome. ;-)
Contest: VOTE It's the Great Pumpkin, Charlie Brown!
- Thread starter tharpdevenport
- Start date
So why did you not allow @auntiehill's avatar and enter your own, because if you had, there would have been four entries.
Not really. An orange one would be guaranteed to win.Too bad it's not a presidential election.
Since there was no answer to my question about the missing entry, and time is running out, I have voted.
Guess who for. Spoiler alert, it's no longer a tie!
Guess who for. Spoiler alert, it's no longer a tie!
^^ Damn! I mean thank you. I better get cogitating.
Sad. But a good rejoinder.Not really. An orange one would be guaranteed to win.
Congrats for Avro Arrow.
(maybe this'll push you over, RJDiogenes ;-)
(maybe this'll push you over, RJDiogenes ;-)
Yes, Congrats @Avro Arrow, even though it still has nearly an hour to run, it looks like you won.
If you could make the next context not so needlessly niche, that would be grand.
If you could make the next context not so needlessly niche, that would be grand.
Witnessed an argument about the correct pronunciation of this word, today. Turned out, Mirriam Webster said both (neesh and nitch) were right.
Thank you for the votes! (Although I'm pretty sure it was 7 - 6 for RJD yesterday 
)
If it was a tie, I would have ceded. Um, can I still do that? No? OK. I will try to have a new contest up sometime this weekend.
I only recall ever hearing neesh. I didn't even realize this was an arguable thing...
(Although I'm pretty sure it was 7 - 6 for RJD yesterday )If it was a tie, I would have ceded. Um, can I still do that? No? OK. I will try to have a new contest up sometime this weekend.
Witnessed an argument about the correct pronunciation of this word, today. Turned out, Mirriam Webster said both (neesh and nitch) were right.
I only recall ever hearing neesh. I didn't even realize this was an arguable thing...
Congrats, Avro, on your victory. I'm sure there were Russians involved, but what's done is done.
And thanks for all the votes, folks.
And thanks for all the votes, folks.
That's okay!
Oh, come now. You're a Trekkie, so by now you should know that just about *everything* is arguable.I only recall ever hearing neesh. I didn't even realize this was an arguable thing...
Oh, come now. You're a Trekkie, so by now you should know that just about *everything* is arguable.
...a Trekkie on THE INTERNET. Not "just about" everything but literally everything is arguable.
...a Trekkie on THE INTERNET. Not "just about" everything but literally everything is arguable.
I disagree, and am currently preparing a three-page essay arguing that definitely not everything is arguable. At least not literally. Looking forward to your counter-arguments.
In the figurative sense, literally nothing is arguable in terms of objectivism, however, speaking entirely from the meta perspective, literally (literally) everything can be argued on the grounds that an argument need not be consistent with objectivity to be defended from a subjective viewpoint.
Guess what? It's time for the new contest!
Similar threads
