I'm not aware of there ever being a canon definition of Han's age.
The official canon movie guide to Solo says he was born 32 years before ANH
Did the Disney-owned Lucasfilm change Han Solo's age? Why? The Wookiepedia website used to state that he was born 29BBY. Now, the website states that he was born 34BBY. Why did Lucasfilm/Disney think it was necessary to change his age? Make him five years older?
Think about? It was in a draft. An excerpt is below with concept art.ETA: Now that I think about it, didn't Lucas think about putting a 13 year old Han in RotS for about five minutes there? This seems less like a retcon and more about ignoring the old EU's assumptions in favour of Lucas's ideas.
Sure, "think about" as in explore the idea but not actually casting someone and filming the scenes.Think about? It was in a draft. An excerpt is below with concept art.
![]()
This will NOT stand!!!!Sure, "think about" as in explore the idea but not actually casting someone and filming the scenes.
Also, I stand corrected as that clearly shows Lucas thought Han would be about 10, not 13 thus the holy write has been violated and this retcon will forever taint the character of Han Solo!![]()
Well his skepticism was in the fact the force connects everything and controls his destiny, not in the Jedi's abilities.Plus, the idea that Han once spent time (even it it was a few days) among Jedi and yet retained a sense of skepticism about the force decades later just doesn't feel right.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.