• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Eric Stoltz made me understand the tragedy of the ending of Back to the Future and the inhumanity of the American Dream

When they made the one off Goodnight Sweetheart special 17 years on, when Gary arrived in 2016 the big thing was mobile phones, I know they were around in 99 but people with their heads down on their phones wasn't.

But nearly 10 years on i don't think 2026 would look that different to 2016
This is HD footage from 90s New York

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
There are people who say that a film like Back to the Future couldn't be made today, because societies between 2025 and 1995 aren't as different as they were between 1985 and 1955. (In between, there were things like Vietnam and the Sexual Revolution.)

Actually, apart from the Internet, I don't remember 1995 being that fundamentally different. Marty, on the other hand, looked like he had landed on Mars.

What do you think?

EDIT:
I remember when Doc wouldn't believe Marty when he told him that Ronald Reagan (an actor!!!) had become President. I don't think you'd have the same reaction in 1995: "Donald Trump President? Uh, okay?".
I would say there are two other fundamental differences between 1995 and today in society and technology: 9/11 and the proliferation of mobile devices (and along with them, social media). Perhaps not quite as sharp in contrast as 1955 and 1985, but I still think it's a distinctive one.

As for the Trump gag in lieu of Reagan, it could still work, especially when tied in with the cult of personality.
 
As a senior in high school in 1988-89, one of my fellow classmates started a computer recycling business. With the money he earned, he was able to buy one of the first car phones that doubled as a mobile phone. That was pretty expensive in those days.
 
As an aside, it's clear that in the original timeline Marty isn't the best student. The new timeline's Marty was supposed to be better in this regard. Now, can the old "Marty" put aside a life of indolence and catch up with this version, thanks to the power of a new truck and two siblings with steady jobs?
Agreed. No one needs to perform mental gymnastics to "explain" something which needed no explanation or refer to sequels to which were not in production when this film and its materialistic end message was in theaters. Marty's performance in school--rather his being habitually late--suggested a general disinterest in school. It was not high on his priorities list, and when confronted by Strickland, his behavior was of the "don't care" variety.

The power of the Almighty Dollar and its toys were presented as being the supportive gifts of a better life. After all, the McFlys were no longer middle to lower middle class, and alternate reality Marty lives a life of privilege, and responsibility (enough for his parents to buy him a new truck) without a care in the world. Thank you, Ronnie Reagan.
 
I definitely did not have a Walkman in 1985. :) Or really anything "name brand".

wm3-opened_1800x1800.jpg


I saved my pennies and bought this very model Walkman in 1984. Back then it cost me $200.00. Used it so much the belt broke and the volume sliders turned green. The Motels and Til Tuesday sounded glorious through it...

Ridiculously expensive purchase for a young man. A decent used car then could be owned for $600.00.

Just some perspective of that time. :)
 
I and my family had what we'd now call "Dollar Store Walkmans" in the late '80s, but they worked and provided hours of pleasure when I was a teenager in junior high and early in my high school career. I wanted a name brand player but, oh well, never got one. I preferred having my first VCRs over getting the name brand Walkman, something I never took to school anyways.
 
I had a portable cassette player when I was a kid, but I'm not sure if it was actually a Sony Walkman or a different brand.
 
I and my family had what we'd now call "Dollar Store Walkmans" in the late '80s, but they worked and provided hours of pleasure when I was a teenager in junior high and early in my high school career. I wanted a name brand player but, oh well, never got one. I preferred having my first VCRs over getting the name brand Walkman, something I never took to school anyways.

This was why I wanted to be clear that Marty had an actual Sony. Lots of us had portable cassette players. (Walgreens!) But a real Sony Walkman? That's something else.

Ridiculously expensive purchase for a young man. A decent used car then could be owned for $600.00.

Right?
 
Right!

I felt my Sony Walkman was ridiculously overpriced, but it was a high-quality unit. Mostly metal. I bought it before I even saw Back to the Future. When I saw how callously Marty stored his own Aiwa version and even took it into the field to persuade George, I was horrified! These things were expensive!!! Were material goods simply disposable commodities in Marty's mind? I dunno.
 
I had a hand me down Sony branded one from older brother but within 2 weeks of regular use a belt snapped.... Before that I had a really nice one but it was a Realistic branded one from Tandy, but it was really nice and ran for ages on one set of batteries. Also had a tuner for radio.
 
I'm not quite sure I buy the hypothesis that "money=better life" was the point that the movie was trying to get across, just like I don't think that was the point of similar movies like Hot Tub Time Machine, Peggy Sue Got Married, etc. It was simply that people with shitty lives were given a second chance at happiness and ended up with a better life.
 
One thing that gets overlooked in the original movie is that Marty saw Doc brutally murdered in front of him. The kid was in shock. He's overjoyed to find Doc's younger self in Hill Valley of the past and even tries to prevent the murder of his friend in the future, but basically Marty is in shock on multiple levels. But his focus on recreating his own existence has priority, rightly so. His grief is short-circuited in a way by his own need for existence.

But all is well in the end. The new improved circumstances of his material life pale in comparison to his intervention where he manipulates his father into growing a quick and lasting spine and manipulating his own mother to see the true value of George McFly.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top