Kind of a weird ending to the season. Apparently a big time jump since last week. And there's a discontinuity with the Kierken character. Two episodes ago, they made such a big deal out of Three warning Kierken about the impending corporate war and making sure his clone stayed alive to retain that information -- yet here, Kierken seemed to know nothing about any of that, and it was like it had never happened. And they just unceremoniously killed him off at the climax, a complete waste of half a season's worth of characterization.
Like others, I hope Kierken is not dead. He could be a clone, as he arrived "on special assignment straight from HQ", while EOS7 was said to be far out in space (HQ presumably being on or near Earth). Clones were said in S1 to have a limited lifespan, but even if that is true for the Transfer Transit version operated by the GA, he could just come in to organise things beforehand and return later when the conference actually starts.
Sure, it looks like he died, but very few people believe that Two, Three, Five and Six are gone (probably not even a single one of them). There are still solutions for Kierken, and his development wouldn't be wasted that way. At least, I sincerely hope so.
I think Kierken was still well aware of what was going on between the corporations. The GA officer who announced him to the men said "we have to protect the delegates from outside threats, and probably more importantly, from each other". Allthough Kierken was sceptical at Two's claims over the comm, he did act on her suggestion to check his own "secure" installations for signs of Zairon saboteurs. His comments to Six about them being criminals and those delegates being fine upstanding corporate citizens does not have to mean he has forgotten that he was trying to prove the involvement of Mikkei and Traugott in major crimes; he's correct when he says that he can't arrest or detain someone like Niemann on the word of a convicted criminal/traitor.
And they'd better not have killed Nyx.
I'm pretty sure Nyx is dead. The Android wasn't trying to rush her to sickbay or attempt any treatment. Body language was telling. And it is needed as a personal cost for Ryo's villainous actions, and another reason for the rest of the crew to turn on him in S3. Unlike One or Kierken, her story seems like it has been told.
Four has really embraced the supervillain role, hasn't he? Blowing up a whole station, starting a galactic war, stealing the blink drive. The one redeeming thing he did was giving his former crewmates a chance to escape, but I'm not sure I find that plausible, given that he was willing to execute his own brother even knowing that the coup wasn't Hiro's fault. By the same ruthless logic, he should realize he'd be better off killing the Raza crew, since they know him well enough to know his vulnerabilities and become a threat. So it seems like a bit too much of a plot convenience.
I disagree; Ryo is the best kind of villain, someone who can justify his acts to himself and view himself as a good guy who has to make hard choices (for the good of Zairon). He is not an all-out villain without any human feelings; it did not save his brother but Ryo has been close to Boone, the Android and especially Portia for a long time. And until the last moment, he was trying to get Two to ally with him. He will probably come to regret not taking the chance to take out his former pals, but I think this is a very reasonable action from his POV. Ryo is a well-written, well-planned character IMO ("I gouged their eyes out" - very first episode), allthough I realise this will probably not be a popular opinion here.
Were we supposed to recognize that guy that Three blurrily saw looming over him at the end there?
It's Lt.Anders, who was shot by Six during the escape from prison. Both survived. Presumably, he will bring Three to safety and then to an interrogation room. Since he has a history with Six, this indicates Six will be around in S3 as well, so Anders can act as a foil.
I'm hoping he was a clone. It wouldn't make sense for the GA to pull him off his assignment to work security for this summit, surely they have thousands of seasoned officers capable of handling a job this important. Perhaps he finagled his way into the job to further investigate Three's claims, and was only acting clueless in front of Six and Two to verify his suspicions. If he's really dead, then they've repeated the same thing that happened to One (and Devon it would appear-I was guessing he'd show up in the finale), dumping carefully plotted story material and wasting our time. I'm hopeful that's not the case.
I think Devon is gone. One, though, is dead but his storyline is bound to return. Since Ryo apparently was careful to not come into a position where Three would ask him about memories, I wonder if this is a hint that Boone murdered Moss' wife after all.
The reason why CEO and billionaire Derrick Moss joined the Raza himself, and why he was murdered afterwards, is also something the show is bound to revisit. It isn't going to stop with Corso's death.
To those who are sceptical: may I remind you that Five's mysterious "keycard" was introduced early in S1 and only got consequences in the second half of S2?
I'm less positive about Kierken, but I would hate it if all that promising development was for nothing. I hope he was a clone after all.
Besides, I'm getting a little tired of hearing "It was a clone!" from the fans every time a character dies on this show. If they actually used that device as often as the audience expected them to, it would quickly rob character deaths of any meaning and just reduce them to lazy cheats.
Like some, I was quite convinced One wasn't gone for good, but I was wrong. With Devon, I was also wrong.
But then, I/we could be right with Kierken. They are going to pull that trick sooner or later, and Kierken would be a great one to use it for. There is nothing precluding him from being a clone, on EOS7. We didn't even see the explosion hit the body, so no proof either way. I prefer to hope that he is alive, until proof to the contrary is revealed.
You are holding out hope for Nyx, with I think is for nought.
I've never really believed that "carefully plotted" was the case here. That may be the impression Mallozzi gives on his blog, but I doubt he'd admit to a more chaotic process. Besides, as J. Michael Straczynski likes to stress, "No plan ever survives its first encounter with the enemy." He was the pioneer of the modern planned-in-advance series arc with Babylon 5, and he kept his plan quite loose -- just the key character arcs and plotlines and events that were most important to cover, with a lot of flexibility toward the specifics of how and when they happened. He added and dropped and replaced characters, reassigned arcs from one character to another, rearranged the timing of the story arcs, etc. as mandated by the vagaries of real life.
Mallozzi has not claimed he has every episode or storyline planned out in advance. Only a general outline and some important points to hit in between. He is quite open about the process of "breaking stories" and (re)writing scripts, not hiding in any way that there are new ideas sometimes. But he very specifically claimed that he had planned the scene in the throne room in Zairon for 7 years (with one change: one character more was supposed to have died, originally - this may have been Nyx), and I can believe that. Those are exactly the kind of things that a writer, who wants to tell a specific story, would have in mind before the rest and the details are worked out. IMO it also shines through in the way the character Four has been handled: he was sinister right from the start. Killing Akita (and later show One asking "why?") was clearly not done merely for shock value, but to make a point about the kind of man he is.
We're two years and 26 episodes into this series, and not a single episode has been written or co-written by a woman, and only three have been directed by a woman (two by Amanda Tapping, one by Mairzee Almas). Not that men are automatically incapable of writing women well, but there can be blind spots that a female perspective can help balance.
While a female perspective would help, isn't it ironic (or maybe just peculiar from me) that I consider Two and Five to be among the best written female characters in live-action SF?
The writers do tend to avoid writing dialogue when it comes to romatic relations, which may be just as well given the triangle of doom in S1. It's not their forte. But I didn't miss it in the Four-Nyx relationship, which was glossed over but it was still clear enough what was going on.
I appreciated getting that conversation between Two and Ryo, though. And between Two and Kierken, after that. It's another kind of relation, but it holds my interest more than whatever could have been done between Nyx and Four/Ryo.
Good point. I can't think of a way around that one.
AFAIK they had no records on the composition of the bomb. Only a general news report, taken from a public feed in the alternate universe.