• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Crank - High Voltage ... Just ... No

Base_Delta_Zero

Commodore
Commodore
I put this here because the shit that goes down in this flick is well beyond the realm of possibility and I get the strong impression the whole thing's meant to be an actual live-action video game, which sounds pretty sci-fi to me. Feel free to move if it fits better elsewhere, of course.

This is intended mainly as a public service anouncement, so I'll try not to rant/review the entire thing.

I loved the first Crank. It was crazy cool with just the right mix of WTF, awesome action, an insane plot and Statham being badass The (First) Transporter Statham. But, like the Transporter movies, Crank 2 has decided to take a formula that worked once, double up on everything remotely cool, turn the dial to 11, break the dial off, jam it into the audience's eye and then shoot the audience in the face.

While the Transporter franchise has only become meh going in this direction, Crank 2 has convinced me never to watch the inevitable direct-to-dvd part 3 or this film ever again. I seriously considered walking out numerous times but couldn't pull myself away from watching the car wreck. Including laugh-crying at John DeLancie's news anchor bits, the whole movie was one disastrous, overplayed, beaten horse, migraine-inducing shot after another. Everything that worked in Crank, failed in Crank 2.

Don't go see this movie. Go outside. Read a book. Argue sci-fi minutia with internet nerds. Do anything else.

PS - If Road Trip was worth you flashing your tits, Amy Smart, why not Crank or Crank 2? What's up with the cut-away body double? Were you holding out for more money? Was it not as artistically relevent to the plot as dry-humping Statham twice in front of hundreds of people then O-facing while confronted by a giant (literal) horse cock? Yes, this happened in movie. No, it was not funny or edgy. Fedgy? Just ... no.
 
Maybe it was meant to be this BAD? I didn't see the first one, and I don't intend to see this one! By the way, the trailers make the flick look horrible!
 
Jason Statham Amy Smart
Crank 2: High Voltage

"The roller coaster thrill ride of the year!" -- Ben Lyons

"Quite possibly the... best... movie... of the... decade." -- Roger Ebert*

"Crank 2 has decided to take a formula that worked once, double up on everything remotely cool, turn the dial to 11, break the dial off, jam it into the audience's eye and then shoot the audience in the face." -- Base Delta Zero


* Actual Ebert review: "This is quite possibly the most insulting movie ever made. It doesn't matter if Statham is at his best here because the movie is too busy beating the audience over the head. Of all the movies to have been released by a major studio, Crank 2 is by far the worst one of the last decade."
 
Last edited:
Jason Statham Amy Smart
Crank 2: High Voltage

"The roller coast thrill ride of the year!" -- Ben Lyons

"Quite possibly... the... best... movie... of the... decade." -- Roger Ebert

"Crank 2 has decided to take a formula that worked once, double up on everything remotely cool, turn the dial to 11, break the dial off, jam it into the audience's eye and then shoot the audience in the face." -- Base Delta Zero
:guffaw:Ya.. I don't think so!
 
I saw trailers for this.

Looks like pure, dumb, shut-off your brain and enjoy the ride fun. I'm not going to go into it expecting a realistic depiction of the plight that real people with cardiovascular problems suffer from.
 
I barely liked Crank. It's still more tolerable than the bloated and horrid In the Name of the King though.
I've seen all Jason Statham movies that he stars in or co-stars and knew this was destined for my Netflix queue.

No way I spend good money on this at the box office.
 
I saw trailers for this.

Looks like pure, dumb, shut-off your brain and enjoy the ride fun. I'm not going to go into it expecting a realistic depiction of the plight that real people with cardiovascular problems suffer from.

You and I sir appear to be a rare breed of movie goer who actually GET movies.
 
I saw trailers for this.

Looks like pure, dumb, shut-off your brain and enjoy the ride fun. I'm not going to go into it expecting a realistic depiction of the plight that real people with cardiovascular problems suffer from.

You and I sir appear to be a rare breed of movie goer who actually GET movies.

One or both of you don't get the complaint.
Its not that all of those saying its unwatchable mean they won't watch it, sure some do mean that.

My post at least was I'm not spending $10 to see it at the theater.
I'll appreciate the mind numbing silliness for the price of about $2.00 in my Netflix queue.
 
I saw trailers for this.

Looks like pure, dumb, shut-off your brain and enjoy the ride fun. I'm not going to go into it expecting a realistic depiction of the plight that real people with cardiovascular problems suffer from.

You and I sir appear to be a rare breed of movie goer who actually GET movies.

One or both of you don't get the complaint.
Its not that all of those saying its unwatchable mean they won't watch it, sure some do mean that.

My post at least was I'm not spending $10 to see it at the theater.
I'll appreciate the mind numbing silliness for the price of about $2.00 in my Netflix queue.

I tend to like movies where you just shut your brain off and have fun -Crank for instance. That's not the problem here.

Crank 2 made me want to tear my brain out through my nose, Egyptian-style. I imagine in a few years it will be some cult classic amongst people who like to watch really horrible movies just for the fact of their horribleness, however, I will not be one of those people.

C2 is right up there with U-turn in the pantheon of unredeemable shit movies. I never let my friend who made me go to that forget just how scarred the film had left me. Now, I will never forgive myself for doing it again all on my own.
 
I wouldn't call this movie horrible. I call it rediculously insane. Perhaps "crazy like a fox!" Granted, I never saw the first film, so this was all new to me. This movie is like the bastard child of Quentin Tarantino & Bugs Bunny with some acid-soaked cinematography reminiscent of a Tony Scott movie. The lack of any sort of subtlety or taste is what makes this movie work.

Plus, I really liked Bai Ling's role in this movie as the exitable wannabe girlfriend. I loved how she was incomprehensible half the time, even with subtitles.
 
Well the first movie, while it was shot in a crazy style and Statham did a lot of crazy shit, it all still took place in a fairly gritty and realistic world (at least up until the end).

But from the reviews it sounds like the sequel takes place in some ridiculous cartoon universe where pretty much anything can happen (starting with the fact he actually survived that huge fall), in which case they probably DID go too far.
 
^Further from reality than the first film but I don't think it's "too far." I think we need more crazyass movies like this. If you half-ass it, you end up with anemic fare like Transporter 3.
 
I still need to see U-Turn.

In defense of Crank 2, it delivered exactly what it promised. Mainly, a movie with the tagline "he was dead...but he got better." It was a little bit more ridiculous than the first film, but no less misogynistic or racist. So judge it on those terms.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top