I agree, although I can also picture someone saying to Lane "Leave my name out of it, I don't want to be associated with that load of old nonsense"Lane always has a "lawyer friend" or a "producer friend" that he has to run back and talk to when someone calls him out on his bullshit.........betting they are all Alec.
One would think that in such a small circle, they could get their story straight. Then again, that's probably hard to do, since the narrative changes depending on which way the wind is blowing.Remember that blog post by Axanar surrogate Jonathan Lane claiming it made more financial sense to build Axanar's studio than to rent one? After many people (detractors, he naturally states) did simple Google searches showing the basis of his claim was fundamentally wrong, Jonathan posted today on Fan Film Factor a mea culpa, "CORRECTION! — It was NOT CHEAPER (as far as I can tell) for AXANAR PRODUCTIONS to BUILD a studio than to RENT one."
And all his fans (and even some "detractors") lauded him for his honesty in coming clean about his bad information (which he actually blamed on somebody else...)? Well, Jonathan now claims even Alec Peters himself corrected him, saying, "Alec Peters IM’d me a few hours later:
« $15,000 a day? Jonathan, if you are going to write about stuff like this then you need to check your facts. A sound stage doesnt cost $15,000 a day. A stage our size might cost between $3,000 and $5,000 a day.»"
Here's the trouble with that newly spun version of events:
- Jonathan first published his calculations as a comment on a blog more than TWO WEEKS prior. It was sitting out there for some time, in Peters' full view, uncorrected because it suited his studio-building narrative.
- Jonathan published that information, now written as a full blog post, on February 17 around 10 am.
- Within "a few hours," Jonathan stated in his mea culpa today, Alec Peters corrected him. Really? It turns out Peters posted a tweet February 17 at 12:39 pm — more than 2.5 hours after Jonathan's post — directing supporters to the FFF blog, even though he supposedly knew its conclusion was based on bad figures, just so he could claim Axanar was just "like three other Star Trek fan films [that] built out a studio."
- Having purportedly corrected his surrogate by IM that same day, Peters did nothing to correct what he had to now know was his own inaccurate tweet that, naturally, contradicted statements about the other films' studios he'd made more than a year before (about which we posted here on February 18).
- And even the supposedly more accurate figures Peters is said to have quoted to Jonathan appear to be wrong. Peter said, "A stage our size might cost between $ 3,000 and $ 5,000 a day." In supposedly cheaper Valencia? When Jody Wheeler's own follow-up post on Saturday found a much bigger (20K sq. ft) studio in Burbank (compared to Axanar's 15K sq. ft. facility) renting for less than $2,000 a day?
- Seems to me if you're going to be quoting a daily rate for your own studio at 2x the going rate in the same market you ain't gonna be in business for long. Nor does it show you did much in the way of market research before either embarking on your own business venture, nor when you allegedly "corrected" your surrogate for making a mistake.
![]()
-The inaccurate tweet = "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!"[*]Having purportedly corrected his surrogate by IM that same day, Peters did nothing to correct what he had to now know was his own inaccurate tweet that, naturally, contradicted statements about the other films' studios he'd made more than a year before (about which we posted here on February 18).
Peters has indeed removed the tweet praising Fan Film Factor's incorrect blog post. This isn't surprising because:-The inaccurate tweet = "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!"
Does that indicate it has been removed from Twitter?
- (about which we posted here on February 18)
Needs a log-in?
And in the continuing saga of Axanar surrogate Jonathan Lane contorting himself to justify the folly of wasting donor money on an apparently failing commercial business, there's this claim about Renegades. @Tom, any truth to Lane's quoting below of Renegades' studio costs?
![]()
Thanks. I 'think' I got them. Let me see if I can do this.Peters has indeed removed the tweet praising Fan Film Factor's incorrect blog post. This isn't surprising because:-The inaccurate tweet = "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!"
Does that indicate it has been removed from Twitter?
- (about which we posted here on February 18)
Needs a log-in?
(a) Peters often deletes tweets and FB posts when he's proven wrong; and
(b) Jonathan said he would tell Peters to take it down; and
(c) Naturally, Peters simply removes the tweet — it never happened! —rather than admit he was wrong.
If you don't do Facebook, I tweeted pretty much the same thing on Saturday about the continuing deception regarding Axanar's studio. That's available here.
"Monday was a big day as we had a potential investor from China visit the Studio. The potential investment is for projects we would do outside of Star Trek. Obviously we can’t take investors for Axanar Productions since we can’t make any profit. But we want to do other small genre productions where we can make money and bring fans content they want to see.
The meeting went great and our guest saw lots of possibilities, including bringing our film school concept to china and even opening up a similar studio in China. Of course all of this would have to happen after Axanar is finished, but it is an exciting opportunity. We asked for $ 5 million to make 3 films.
Now, I have raised almost $ 10 million in investment capital in my previous businesses, so this is nothing new to me. And we have a great entertainment lawyer guiding us as well. So I am hoping for big things to come in the next few months."
Has anyone ever seen the two of them together in the same room?The more I think about this, the more I think LFIM/Slow Lane's blathering is just wanton ego stroking - if any of the faithful are still left and listening to it, I think I can count their number on one hand.
What I'm really interested in is about how long it'll be before this narcissistic tool runs out of money to pay for his 'studio'......
I think several of us have that thought........Has anyone ever seen the two of them together in the same room?![]()
You get my undying love with the Marni Nixon reference.Thanks. I 'think' I got them. Let me see if I can do this.
Nope. I couldn't get the images to show up in this post.
But I was able to bring over the log that goes with this picture in one of them:
Once Upon A Time -- October 12, 2915
![]()
Hey, several big things 'did' come over the next few months!
CBS & Paramount came to visit for just over a year.
There were lots of fun conventions.
Plenty of gas for the cars and telephones for the friends.
Lots of eating out at restaurants. Thousands and thousands of dollars for eating out at restaurants. Eating out is fun.
Like Tony Todd did Christian Gossett ... had enough of something
Let's see, the guy from I think it was the OKC studio was accused of something
And you got to make lots of threatening calls, IMs, emails, and such. How great is that!
There was that guideline thing too!
Don't forget that $5,000 movie theater to play your 20 minute film. That was greaaattt!!
And that great Trekzone.com interview
There were lots of people hanging on your every word. Taking pictures of your every word, you celebrity of a tiny niche subgroup of a subgroup, you! Getting to knoooow youuu. Getting to know allllll a-bout youuuu Marni Nixon had such a beautiful voice. I'll miss her.
There was that three minute scene!
Like Tony Todd and Christian Gossett did... Terry McIntosh had enough of something too. Odd.
There was a lot of banning. "Your Fired!!" Good times.
Whole bunches of deletings. "I'll delete 'this' one... and 'this' one... oh, let's delete that one... and let's delete all of that" Fun Fun Fun
Some kind of kerfuffle about some money, where'd it go or something
You started a new shell company. Yay.
A mix-up or something about financial records.
3 million dead people and illegal aliens voted against you. No. Wait. That wasn't Mini-Me.. That was Dr. Evil wasn't it. Apologies.
But there were trips to Europe. Trips are fun.
Tons of social media interaction. You and Predator Drumph I'll tell ya. You're just like peas in a pod!
And the lovely Erin Ranahan.
There were several buses with lots of people being run over by them.
I know you said you reallllly wanted to see the Ninth Circuit. Sorry you didn't get to.
So there 'were' some big things that came along those next few months after all! Say, how are your Chinese friends doing?
HATER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!This! This! This!
Yes, I know, you have to drive to some of these (quelle horreur!). So do it. Even if you bill out at $100/hour for three production people for, say, a three-hour commute on a daily basis (an exorbitant rate, I might add), we are still talking about $550 - $2175/day. Actor day rates don't change so don't add them in.
- Here's one with film production rates of $1500/day or $150/hour in case you don't need a full day: http://evidencefilmstudios.com/rates/
- Here's one for $1000/day for stage, $1750/day for pre-lit and green (I assume they mean green screening) and $600/day for build/prep/strike. Air/heat is $100/day: http://www.digitalfilmstudios.com/wp2/studios/studio-rate-sheet/
- Here's one for $950/day and $600/half-day, hourly rate of $125 with a 2-hour minimum: http://www.monkspace.com/pricing.html
- Variable rates here depending upon how many people you need in the crew, including going without. Day rates range from $250 (BYO crew and equipment; it was the cheapest rate I found) to $1875 (basic equipment and up to 2 crew members - this was the most expensive rate I found): http://openmediafoundation.org/studiorates
- Hourly rates only for this one, $65 - $75, depends on how many people are in the shoot (expensive but partial days would be somewhat economical): http://www.ostrichstudio.com/pricing/
'Tis a far cry from the quoted $15,000/day.
~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Mr. Lane,
You have said very kind things about me, and I do appreciate it. However, here, please note, I (along with other folks, BTW) have done your homework for you. Which, I am certain, you would not find acceptable if anyone you knew was to have someone do their homework for them, right?
But be that as it may, these figures are out there, and anyone can yell all they want to and scream 'Hater!' and other such juvenile nonsense, but I hardly think any of these studios - none of which I had heard of before just now - could be referred to as a hater. I am certain they do not have any sort of an opinion about AP or Axa or anything else within your or my purview.
While it may be possible to cherry-pick a few things, to nitpick and say that this one and that studio would not be suitable for your needs, my research took me all of ten minutes and I got back over 2.6 million hits on Google. Hence even if all five of my selections come up short, and so do @Noname Given 's and @Jody Wheeler 's, surely you can find an acceptable solution on your own, without bothering your producer friend and without purchasing a white elephant studio way off the beaten path for most talent.
And here's a search for you, too: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=film+studio+day+rates+in+los+angeles
The truth exists. Please don't varnish it with a desire to make Axa or AP (or both) somehow look good for what is, at bottom, a monumentally poor business decision. These numbers do not lie.
Sincerely, Janet Gershen-Siegel
Babylon 5 was actually filmed in an abandoned space station in orbit over Epsilon III Eridani. Get your facts straight!One of my favorte Sci-if shows, Babylon 5, actually filmed mostly everything in an old Hot Tub factory! True story, and goes to prove you can shoot quality sci-if almost anywhere, if you have enough ingenuity and drive to do it!
What does God need with a 15k a month professional studio anyways?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.