Why do we need to? Characters should be like people, make mistakes and learn from them.
But by the end of Galaxy's Child, there's no clear evidence that Geordi has actually learnt from his mistakes.
Why do we need to? Characters should be like people, make mistakes and learn from them.
Why do we need to? Characters should be like people, make mistakes and learn from them. TNG was sterile enough already sometimes, should we take away any moments where the characters are wrong or make bad decisions or act rashly? Besides which, are we talking about the scene where Leah accuses him of things he did not do? (She basically accuses him of the same things that this thread has.) It's not unusual to lash out when accused of something that isn't true.
Leah attempts to apologize, but Geordi rejects it and admits the fault was his, then explains that he values the real Leah as she is. It sounds to me like he admits a mistake and learns a lesson.the ending of the episode endorses Geordi's point of view, that it was Leah who was primarily in the wrong, and she's the one doing the apologizing to him. He doesn't really admit any mistakes or learn any lessons -- if he did, I think that would fix what rubs me the wrong way about "Galaxy's Child."
No argument there."and that's why you need more women in the writer's room."
Honestly, we don't know the circumstances, and many years had passed. It could very well be that Leah's marriage fell apart without Geordi's interference, and then they reconnected. It could be that her marriage was for a set period of time, like was mentioned about one of Kirk's marriages in one of the novels, or like handfasting and similar things in some cultures here on Earth in the present - and they just decided not to continue it. (And if Geordi was a factor in that in Brahms' mind, that's not his fault, I don't think.) It could EVEN be (given that this is Star Trek) that he wasn't even referring to the original Leah Brahms *at all*, but to the holodeck version of her brought into "the real world" by some mechanism of technology brought back by Voyager, or by whatever the heck that was that left the ship in "Emergence", or however else. There were implications to the mention of that name, but not enough to solidly say that Geordi was a scoundrel in any way.I know the writers made a nod to Continuity by having "Future Geordi" refer to his wife Leah in, "All Good Things". But, that was unfortunate & troubling because Geordi ultimately "won" and got the girl.
Not generally, no, but I think you could be forgiven if they were inappropriate enough to angrily demand to know if they're in your spank bank, without knowing you nearly well enough to talk to you about such things. Which is sort of what the 20th-21st century analog is to this situation, if there is one.So when you meet someone you've fantaised about, do you lie to their face if they ask you a direct question?
Indeed - responsible people looking to make things better, as opposed to people looking for reasons to be offended. Hopefully there will be a lot more of the former in the 24th century than there are now.She forgave him for making her feel bad, came to understand that he meant no harm. That's what people do sometimes.
And Leah was also right to try to apologize, in her own new context. Because when she thought that Geordi had generated the hologram for impure reasons, her accusations were just, but, once she realized that he really hadn't meant any harm, she also realized that she had been accusing him of some pretty nasty things. She wasn't to blame for any of what had happened with the hologram - I'm not victim blaming - but she took responsibility for what she then realized was a disproportional response to what had been done.Leah attempts to apologize, but Geordi rejects it and admits the fault was his, then explains that he values the real Leah as she is. It sounds to me like he admits a mistake and learns a lesson.
Agreed, but, it would have been inconsistent with Leah as she was presented on the holodeck, who definitely flirted with a male. But, she could have said she had a wife and been bi.As an aside, I think they missed a small opportunity at the end. When Leah tells Geordie she's married, I hoped she was going to tell him she was gay. Would have been a nice touch, and a little diversity on the show.
You yourself just said "Because when she thought that Geordi had generated the hologram for impure reasons, her accusations were just", so I don't think her questioning Geordi's motives were inappropriate. Besides, my original quote was referring to when Leah asked innocent questions about Geordi's modifications that came as a result of his genuine engineering work in the holodeck, and he still denied it and/or took credit that he should have shared with (Holo)Brahms.Not generally, no, but I think you could be forgiven if they were inappropriate enough to angrily demand to know if they're in your spank bank, without knowing you nearly well enough to talk to you about such things. Which is sort of what the 20th-21st century analog is to this situation, if there is one.
Flirty behaviour is flirty behaviour, regardless of gender. Her incorrect sexuality could have been part of the 9.3% (or however much) margin of error.Agreed, but, it would have been inconsistent with Leah as she was presented on the holodeck, who definitely flirted with a male. But, she could have said she had a wife and been bi.
You're joking right?I dont think Geordi was a bad or harmfull person.
But I think he might have needed a few appointments with Troi to explain what appropriate behavior is.
As an aside, I think they missed a small opportunity at the end. When Leah tells Geordie she's married, I hoped she was going to tell him she was gay. Would have been a nice touch, and a little diversity on the show.
Roddenberry always said he wanted homosexuality represented in TNG, it was Paramount who vetoed it.But it was like 1989.
As an aside, I think they missed a small opportunity at the end. When Leah tells Geordie she's married, I hoped she was going to tell him she was gay. Would have been a nice touch, and a little diversity on the show.
How was anything he did sexist? Not trying to have an argument here, I'm honestly curious.Even when I first watched it as a teenage girl, Geordi seemed like the typical creepy sexist nerd to me.
How was anything he did sexist? Not trying to have an argument here, I'm honestly curious.
I hope you're not implying that the sexuality of her holodeck copy would be determined more-or-less randomly based on a dice roll against the percentage of the population that is gay. Because while that would make for some pretty amusing holodeck shenanigans, I'm pretty sure that working from that profile Starfleet took of her, it can do better than LGBTQIA random-select.Flirty behaviour is flirty behaviour, regardless of gender. Her incorrect sexuality could have been part of the 9.3% (or however much) margin of error.
Riker claims that it is against protocol, La Forge denies that claim and then Riker as much as admits that La Forge is correct.In Hollow Pursuits, it's described as being against protocol suggesting it isn't a legal matter.
It's never said to be illegal to use someone's likeness on the holodeck/suite. Kira threatens Quark with physical violence if he again attempts to take a holo-image of her, but there's nothing said about whether it is legal or not. Quark later makes an illegal access to station personnel files in his quest to make a holo-Kira, but that's a different matter.I thought DS9 later told us that making holographic representations of real people without their consent is illegal, as it was stated to Quark when he was trying to make a holo-Kira lovebot for his "associate"...?
The computer based simul-Brahms on her logs. Assuming she never wrote a log while in a bad mood, why would the computer think she was anything but friendly? Leah has never met Geordi before, and she came into the situation mad about the situation. She's quite friendly once she gets to know him and they sort out their little misunderstanding.I'd also say the computer has played a mischievous role. The easy to-get-to-know, convivial Holobrahms is incredibly out of kilter with the forbidding figure that appeared on the transporter pad to hurl verbal abuse at Geordi right off the bat. The 'puter royally screwed that one up.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.