ThisWe don't need to harvest thunderstorms. We can already produce positrons in the lab, for example:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27998860#.Xmfmhqj7SUk
BTW, protons and anti-protons are not created in thunderstorms. To produce protons and anti-protons would require about 1,836 times more energy. An electron is that much less massive than a proton.
/end thread
There is no reasonable way to harvest antimatter from life or weather processes. The only way to do so now is in the lab, which scientists are getting better at.
I imagine one day future people might be able to construct massively huge particle accelerators in solar orbit to provide anti-matter for spaceflight, and medical uses, etc (I am hoping we're past the interest in developing annihilation weapons but I'm cynical enough to think those will be made as well). if that ends up being more useful for travel than fusion, solar-sail, magsail, whatever. Who knows what practicable uses for it people will have in the future? What if antimatter behaves very differently, or oppositely when it comes to gravity? That alone could generate some extremely interesting uses.
So there is a need for antimatter, but as interesting as lightening discharges generating a bit of it might be, hard to imagine its more than a scientific curiosity. It would be interesting to eventually find if Venusian lightening, which is very different from Earth lightening due to the lack of water vapor, also emits positrons.