Seriously, why does everybody hate this one
I can't speak for everyone, but I can speak for myself. I found it to be extremely shoddily done. A potentially decent concept, ruined by incoherence and bad production. Off the top of my head:
1) The actor playing Lazarus wasn't that great, IMO.
2) Between shots, his beard kept changing (I don't mean between versions of Lazarus, I mean
shots)
3) Incomprehensibly, they kept throwing in stock footage of Lazarus falling off the same damn rock, for nearly no reason (I think I even read somewhere it was because they needed to fill time)
4) The story was incredibly badly unveiled. It took the "sane Lazarus" to basically sit Kirk down and do straight exposition to get it out.
5) I felt the negative image effect for the gate between universes was shoddy, even by 1967 standards.
If I were sitting down and watching it, I'm sure I'd have even more to complain about. But I'm with Yeoman Randi, I can watch nearly every episode but this one.
and like that [superbly written excellently produced] City on the Edge of Forever so much?
Again, just speaking for myself:
1) Fully realized plot
2) A tragic choice for James Kirk
3) A wonderfully acted Edith Keeler
4) *Good* special effects by 1967 standards
5) A very uncharacteristically but completely appropriate somber ending
6) Great dialog for nearly all characters—everyone gets a chance to really
act and they are up to it. They really pull it off.
YMMV, of course. But those are my thoughts.