That's what I believe. The whole imperial system is just made up shit to confuse the rest of the world. that's the only logical conclusionThat's like saying that inches and miles ain't real terms.
That's what I believe. The whole imperial system is just made up shit to confuse the rest of the world. that's the only logical conclusionThat's like saying that inches and miles ain't real terms.
Say it ain't so!Feels like some Year of Hell reset is coming up.
That's what I believe. The whole imperial system is just made up shit to confuse the rest of the world. that's the only logical conclusion
But thanks to Worf in "Unification, Part 1," we know that Klingon leaders sometimes rewrite history to suit their preferred narratives. (At least, Worf said that Gowron was doing it, and his tone suggested he considered it a fairly routine thing for a chancellor to do.) So Martok's interpretation of Klingon history is not necessarily accurate. He may be honestly reporting what he learned in school, but what he was taught may have been false.
I'm not really sure I buy they idea that Martok was embarrassed by this or that Klingon history was later revised to neglect any mention of a beachhead in the Sol system. I mean think about it, the Klingons have literally established a base of operations in the heart of the Federation. If anything, that's the sort of thing that'll get embellished through song and exaggeration by Klingons, not swept under the rug and forgotten.
One thing I will credit Discovery for, they spell the planet's name correctly, it's Qo'nos. Even displayed on screen in the subtitles during one of the really talky Klingon language scenes spelled with a Q and an apostrophe. Don't be calling it Kronos is a Disco discussion.Currently the songs peal and the blood wine flows but as soon as they get their asses handed to them at Kronos their narrative will change to:
Somebody really needs to compile a YouTube video showing all the things in TOS that were contradicted by TNG, DS9, or even later episodes of TOS. The idea that Star Trek has ever had tight continuity becomes absolutely ridiculous if you actually sit down and watch it from beginning to end.
One thing I will credit Discovery for, they spell the planet's name correctly, it's Qo'nos. Even displayed on screen in the subtitles during one of the really talky Klingon language scenes spelled with a Q and an apostrophe. Don't be calling it Kronos is a Disco discussion.
Because that's how canon works. Show X does an episode establishing fact Y. At that point fact Y is part of the canon, even if Show W has said something different.Then why did Nerys Myk weigh in with the comment that "it's canon,"
Because that's how canon works. Show X does an episode establishing fact Y. At that point fact Y is part of the canon, even if Show W has said something different.
Exactly.But as mentioned, canon and continuity are not synonyms. "The canon" is just the overall body of work, contradictions and all. It's not a value judgment or a designation of "rightness," it's merely a nickname for the original creation as distinct from its tie-ins and fanfic. Its internal continuity, meanwhile, is a moving target that changes and evolves as new stories are added to it and older stories are reinterpreted. When two details contradict each other, as a rule, it's the later one that takes precedence -- James T. Kirk instead of R., dilithium instead of lithium, Data not having emotions, etc.
and the planet we saw was WAY too bright for a world that far from the sun
Statistically speaking, we only know that there is A planet Earth 9.3 billion miles from the Sun. The original one can still be there. And I already know why it's there!Nope it was on screen it's now canon Earth is 9.3 billion miles from the sun.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.