• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers WATSON: New Sherlock Holmes-based series on CBS

Christopher

Writer
Admiral
I just discovered the new series Watson, which is from Craig Sweeny, who was one of the core producers on CBS's Elementary. This is CBS's second Sherlock Holmes-based procedural, but it goes in a different direction from Elementary. In this version, Watson (Morris Chestnut) is a clinical geneticist who returns to medical practice after Holmes apparently dies at Reichenbach Falls, leaving Watson a fortune that he uses to found the Holmes Clinic in Pittsburgh, where Watson and his team solve House-style medical mysteries (and House was itself a Sherlock Holmes knockoff of sorts), with a touch of detective drama thrown in as well, since Watson applies Holmes's detective training to his medical mysteries, or occasionally (as in last night's episode 3) stumbles across a criminal case he can solve using his team's medical knowledge.

The show has its share of formulaic elements -- for instance, both of the first two episodes had the exact same beat, a patient resigned to dying from a hereditary terminal condition turning out to have something curable after all -- but it has some points of interest. This version of Watson is a student of genetics and human nature and has assembled a team of young doctors with interesting quirks, including a pair of identical twins with very different personalities (both played by Peter Mark Kendall), a Texan doctor adopted from China as an infant (Inga Schlingmann), and a neurologist (Eve Harlow) who might be a psychopath. His wife Mary Morstan (Rochelle Aytes) is his boss and is divorcing him. (Harlow's character is also Watson's personal neurologist as well as his employee. Conflict of interest? What's that?)

Watson needs a neurologist because he's suffering from traumatic brain injury after Reichenbach and dealing with health problems, and he's assisted by Shinwell Johnson (Richie Coster), an ex-con character from "The Adventure of the Illustrious Client" who was previously adapted as a recurring player in Elementary's 5th season. This version of Shinwell is basically Watson's Watson, or maybe his Mrs. Hudson, but he's being blackmailed by Moriarty's agent (Kacey Rohl) to spy on Watson and do the occasional sinister thing. In the pilot, Watson didn't remember Shinwell at first after his concussion, so I suspected Shinwell would turn out to be Moriarty, but they went in a different direction, perhaps because they didn't want to repeat a twist from Elementary. Moriarty appears in the pilot, played by Randall Park, the MCU's Agent Jimmy Woo, who's not at all who I would've expected in the role of a sinister mastermind.

I was unsure what to expect from this, since the reviews were mixed, and though Craig Sweeny did some good work on Elementary, he also scripted and executive-produced the terrible Star Trek: Section 31 movie. (He may have brought in Kacey Rohl here after working with her on that.) So far, though, I find it reasonably interesting. Elementary gave us a Watson who'd given up medicine and embraced a new career as a detective, so it's an interesting alternate take to see a Watson who's left detective work to resume his medical career. Watson was always second banana to Holmes in detective work, but in the medical arena, he can come into his own, which is an idea worth exploring. The geneticist angle seems to come out of nowhere, but I guess they wanted a touch of modernity in the character. Or maybe Sweeny wanted to do a show about a geneticist and CBS asked him to do it as another Holmes pastiche? Anyway, the Holmes-mythos elements and the partial blending of medical and detective dramas add some interesting flavor to it. And it's probably only a matter of time before Holmes turns up alive.

I was surprised when the pilot established that Watson's full name was John Hamish Watson, because I'd thought that the BBC's Sherlock coined that middle name. But it turns out it was actually proposed in a 1943 essay by Dorothy L. Sayers, as a way of reconciling why Mary addressed Watson as "James" (the English equivalent of the Scottish Hamish) in one story. (I recommend the essay -- it's quite cleverly reasoned.) The show does crib one thing from Sherlock, the depiction of text messages hovering in the air -- that's a pretty standard device now, but I'm pretty sure Sherlock started it.

Hmm -- so CBS has now done two Holmes-based series, Elementary and Watson. Logically, their third one will have to be titled My Dear.
 
I'm enjoying it so far. I'm not typically into medical dramas, but this one's keeping my attention all the same, and it does have a fun cast who are enjoyable to watch interacting.
 
Just wanted to add, the show is on CBS Sunday nights at 9 PM Eastern, and goes up on Paramount+ shortly thereafter (it wasn't up when I checked P+ shortly after 10 PM, but it was there the next morning). I wasn't aware of it until I saw a banner for it on P+ the other day, so I got caught up over the weekend. I hadn't even realized P+ carried current CBS shows, since I rarely watch anything on broadcast TV anymore.

It bugs me slightly that they couldn't find real twin actors to play the Croft brothers. The split-screen/doubling FX are seamless these days, but I feel the performances would've been more authentic from real twins. Though they presumably do it like Orphan Black did, with a double performing one of the twins opposite Kendall playing the other, then swapping places for the other half of the performance. IMDb lists two actors, Riley Orr and Andrew Dobbie, as "Croft Twin," with Dobbie in the first two episodes and Orr in all three so far. I wonder why they'd need two doubles.

It occurred to me to wonder if Kacey Rohl's character might turn out to be Irene Adler, but then I remembered Irene is American (born in New Jersey), and Rohl's character has a British accent. Of course, Watson is British in the canon and American here, so who knows?
 
Pretty good episode this week, with an interesting approach to generating a medical mystery that was also a good way to give a glimpse of the characters' pasts and flesh them out a little more. There was some creative direction with the surreal depiction of the flashbacks and unreliable memories.

The nods to the larger story arc were clumsier -- Shinwell set apart from the rest and addressing a monologue to the robot, Ingrid making a tacked-on reference to Moriarty. I think I would've preferred it if they'd let this be a pure standalone episode, solely about fleshing out the characters rather than advancing a plot arc. The arc elements felt disconnected, as if they were added to a standalone script in rewrites, and not very smoothly.
 
This week's episode reminded me less of Sherlock Holmes or House than of Quincy, M.E., since it was less about solving a medical mystery and more about speaking up in protest of a social and institutional injustice. Nice to see that the show is willing to mix things up and not hew to a single formula. (My main complaint about Elementary was that it was obliged to conform to the American procedural format where every episode had to be a murder mystery, as opposed to the Holmes canon where Holmes and Watson tackled many different kinds of cases.)

Along similar lines, this is also the first episode of Watson where there's been no mention of Sherlock Holmes or Moriarty. The only allusion to the Holmes mythology at all was the nod to Shinwell Johnson's criminal past. Last week, I complained that the season-arc scenes felt awkwardly tacked onto what was otherwise an episodic story. It feels nice to see a genuinely standalone episode, one where the only continuity elements are about character development rather than advancing a plot arc.
 
I liked this week they fleshed out Watson and Shinwell's relationship besides Shinwell just being his chauffeur and being forced to betray Watson by Moriarty or his agent.
 
Interesting episode this week. I like how they're not just doing the House-style medical-mystery formula every week but are coming up with more creative ways to combine the mystery element with the medical element -- in this case, having a live feed of an unconscious, severely ill camgirl and having to deduce her identity and location from what they could see on the screen. That was a clever idea, and I was actually disappointed that they found her so soon and it reverted back to a more conventional medical mystery.

I have to wonder, though, couldn't they have contacted the site that hosted the video chats and alerted them to the problem? Couldn't they have contacted the police and used their resources to contact the site and get her identity info, given that she was in imminent danger? It's odd that those possibilities weren't even raised.

I'm still kind of ambivalent about the character arcs with the junior doctors. Some of what the writers are trying to develop with them is interesting, but some of it feels like contrived drama. I actually found their interplay a bit annoying this week, like they were a bunch of children who couldn't set aside their schoolyard banter to focus on being doctors.

We got a bit more info about this universe's version of Sherlock Holmes, and it's a little weird. Watson was only with him for a year? That's surprisingly brief. They're perpetuating the overused idea of Irene Adler as Holmes's love interest, which she emphatically was not in the original story. (The one time I didn't mind was Elementary's version, since they did something quite clever with it.) But they add the weird twist that "Mrs. Hudson" was actually a sex worker or something that Holmes passed off as a housekeeper. Not sure I care for that idea. (Particularly since I'm currently rewatching the Jeremy Brett Holmes series, so I can't get the image of Rosalie Williams's grandmotherly Mrs. Hudson out of my head. I'm also up to season 5 in my Elementary rewatch, so I've got two distinct versions of Shinwell Johnson in my current awareness, and it hasn't been that long since I saw a third version in "The Illustrious Client" in the Brett series.)
 
A decent episode this week, but I have mixed feelings. It was the kind of mystery story that bugs me, in that the investigators arbitrarily overlook an obvious clue to prolong the story. (For instance, I recall a Castle episode where the police considered everyone a suspect except the victim's spouse, even though countless mystery and procedural stories over the decades have told us that the spouse is always the first suspect the police look at. So it was screamingly obvious that the spouse was the killer.) I mean, Ginny came in after cutting her own abdomen open to get something out, so you'd think they would've at least looked at her abdomen to rule out the possibility.

In this case, though, I can almost excuse it, because it's not unheard of for doctors to ignore what a patient says if they assume it's the result of a psychological disorder, or if it just conflicts with their preconceptions. Still, it seems contrived that they didn't conduct such a simple test as x-raying her abdomen, particularly since they knew she'd had a miscarriage.

Maybe the case-of-the-week got short shrift because of the focus on the Moriarty arc, which had some significant development. And we finally hear Sherlock Holmes's voice, as Watson's hallucination. I'm underwhelmed with Matt Berry as the voice of Holmes; I don't find his voice particularly interesting. Looking at his photos on IMDb, he clearly doesn't look the part, so presumably he's just a placeholder for whoever they finally cast as Holmes if the show lasts long enough (since it's inevitable that he'll turn up alive eventually).
 
I watched about half the first episode before turning it off. Interesting premise, not my speed
 
I'm underwhelmed with Matt Berry as the voice of Holmes; I don't find his voice particularly interesting. Looking at his photos on IMDb, he clearly doesn't look the part, so presumably he's just a placeholder for whoever they finally cast as Holmes if the show lasts long enough (since it's inevitable that he'll turn up alive eventually).

I have to agree with you that when we heard Berry as the voice of Holmes, it wasn't quite what I was expecting either. I agree with you that it's highly likely that Sherlock isn't dead and will show up (probably in the season finale) and I've been trying come up with a good choice to play him. For some reason, I keep coming back to Tom Ellis. I think he's got the talent to pull it off, and there's only a ten year difference between him and Morris Chestnut, so they are close to being contemporaries.

Not likely to happen, but I think he'd be great in the role.
 
For some reason, I keep coming back to Tom Ellis. I think he's got the talent to pull it off, and there's only a ten year difference between him and Morris Chestnut, so they are close to being contemporaries.

He was Lucifer, right? I don't quite see it. My first thought when you brought it up was Tom Mison from Sleepy Hollow.

Come to think of it, I remember thinking while watching Loki season 2 that Tom Hiddleston would make a terrific Sherlock Holmes. He's probably too pricey for CBS, though, or too busy.

Then again, if Watson and Moriarty aren't white in this show's universe, there's no reason Holmes has to be. I just rewatched the Reichenbach Falls scene in the pilot, and it doesn't look like we see Holmes clearly enough to narrow down his ethnicity. So that opens it up to more diverse possibilities.
 
Yeah, Ellis was Lucifer. And your right, there's no reason necessarily to expect that Holmes is white, just that he at least sounds British, I reckon.

Good news about the show being renewed. Both my wife and I are enjoying it.
 
I still find it interesting that in the first half of the 20th century, nearly all Sherlock Holmes adaptations onscreen were set in the then-present day (as far as I know, the only period pieces were the silent-film version of William Gillette's play and the first two Rathbone-Bruce movies, as well as the Rathbone-Bruce radio series); then for the next six decades, every Holmes adaptation depicted him as a 19th-century figure, without exception (there were a few productions that had him cryogenically frozen or time-travelled to the present or future, but always originating in the past); yet in the past 15 years we've had multiple present-day version of Holmes and Watson, including Sherlock, Elementary, the comic book Watson and Holmes (where they're African-Americans in Harlem), Miss Sherlock (where they're Japanese women), and now Watson.

I've often wondered why that was the case. It makes sense that the early adaptations were set in the present, since there have been Holmes films being made since 1900 and the stories were still being published as late as 1927, so the earliest filmmakers would've seen Holmes as a contemporary figure. And it makes sense that that perception would've lingered for a while thereafter, even after the stories receded into the past, which is part of why most of the Rathbone-Bruce movies were set in the 1940s. I guess that by the '50s, the perception of Holmes as a period figure had come to dominate, which explains why the emphasis shifted to period pieces -- although it doesn't quite explain why there were no modern updates onscreen for six decades. Still, I guess it was inevitable that someone would want to try it eventually, and once it proved successful, it opened the door for more.
 
A strong episode this week, introducing the show's version of Irene Adler (Whoopie Van Raam) -- who's English here rather than American, though Ingrid questions whether that's her real nationality. It's a different kind of mystery, since Irene claims her son who needs Watson's help is actually Sherlock's son, and it's as much about determining whether she's pulling a con as it is about diagnosing the kid. It's perhaps the show's deepest dive into the Holmes mythos so far, exploring a lot about Holmes's life, family, and relationship with Watson despite his absence. Also plenty of canon nods, like a mention of Adelbert Gruner from "The Illustrious Client" (who evidently hasn't run afoul of Kitty Winter in this continuity) and a reference to the submarine plans in "The Bruce-Partington Plans." (Odd that they'd leave a photograph of highly classified military submarine plans just lying around for everyone to look at.)

And that was fast -- just two days after I suggested that Holmes didn't necessarily have to be white in this series, we get confirmation that he was, since his alleged son is white, and so is Mycroft (Vincent Gale). And once again, Mycroft is played by a slender actor. It's bizarre how often that happens -- Christopher Lee in The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes, Mark Gatiss in Sherlock (who's not exactly thin but not Mycroft-heavy), Rhys Ifans in Elementary (though he was said to have lost weight since he was younger), Sam Claflin in Enola Holmes, etc. The only Mycroft performers I've seen that fit his description in the canon are Charles Gray from The Seven Per Cent Solution and the Jeremy Brett TV series and Stephen Fry in Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows.
 
We just finished watching a few minutes ago. Definitely a fun ride and I really enjoyed seeing the staff broken into teams. All of the characters are really growing on me at this point. I'm glad that we'll definitely get a second season.

And I feel vindicated by the reveal of Mycroft - I still say that Tom Ellis would make a great Sherlock!

:p
 
The twins still don't register to me. I keep forgetting their names and what their purposes are.

The ex-wife has the thankless role of the "police captain who doesn't get to go out and investigate with the lead detectives" since she's the boss and not part of Watson's team. I think this is twice now she wasn't in an episode.
 
Last edited:
The twins still don't register to me. I keep forgetting their names and what their purposes are.

The ex-wife has the thankless role of the "police captain who doesn't get to go out and investigate with the lead detectives" since she's the boss and not part of the medical staff. I think this is twice now she wasn't in an episode.

I have similar reactions. I have trouble keeping the twins straight, in name and personality, and Mary does seem rather peripheral. If there were any cast changes, I'd consider them the most expendable.


It just struck me that this show is burning through canonical Holmes characters much faster than Elementary did. There, we got Gregson, Sebastian Moran, Mrs. Hudson (as Miss Hudson), Irene, and Moriarty (after a fashion) in season 1, Mycroft and Lestrade in season 2, Kitty Winter and Adelbert Gruner in season 3, and Shinwell Johnson in season 5 (even though those last three all came from "The Illustrious Client"). Here, most of them (except Lestrade and Kitty, I think) have been depicted or at least mentioned in just the first eight episodes.
 
The scene with Shinwell at Diogenes really had me laughing this week.

I actually have no problem differentiating the twins. Stephens is the dour one with glasses while Adam is the more upbeat one without glasses.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top