• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The Killing Game - Poorly Executed:

Praxius

Fleet Captain
Fleet Captain
Hello.... Over the weekend we watched the two-part "The Killing Game" from Season 4 (breakdown: the Hirogen take over Voyager and subject the crew to various holodeck programs where they're continually hunted)

Am I the only one who was disappointed by the historical inaccuracy of this episode, poor story line, actors handling the WWII firearms like some poor 70's crime sitcom, how the German uniforms, flags, symbols were inaccurate, how the Germans and Americans only seemed to have two firearms at their disposal (Luger/Kar98 - Colt/M1 Garand) and a slew of other poor attempts of telling history?

Sure they got a few things right in the story..... but overall, it was poorly executed, and not to mention Janeway's kick in the nards to the Prime Directive of handing the Hirogen Federation Technology...... plus the fact that the entire episode seemed to give the impression that WWII only consisted of the Germans, "Americans" and the occupied French.....

I dunno.... I always figured if you're going to make an episode relating to our history/past.... you'd do your home work and make it accurate, or don't do it at all.
 
No, it doesn't bother me in the least.
It's sci-fi.
I don't look to shows dealing with extreme fiction to be historically accurate.
I'm impressed if they are but I never expect them to be due to it being a show based in fiction.
I don't even take the time to focus on such stuff, honestly.
Never having held a firearm myself, I wouldn't notice if they were holding it wrong. However, I wouldn't expect foriegn aliens or people centuries from now to know how to use out of date weaponary nor would I expect aliens like the Hirogen to know what historical accuracy is when designing a holoprogram of a part of history they know nothing about.
It's like asking Neelix to design a holoprogram of Washington DC knowing he's never seen it or knows nothing about it.
Besides, this was covered in TOS "A Piece of the Action".
Kirk pointed out that there were all types of historical mistakes because the only info those aliens had of our history and of the mob came from a book.

I enjoy the story for what it was, much like I enjoy most of Voyager and Trek as pure escapism entertainment.
 
Last edited:
I would never accuse Star Trek of trying to teach us about history in a direct sense.

Teach us about learning from our mistakes? Yes, absolutely.

Teach us historical accuracies of German Nazi symbols? No.

:wtf:
 
I guess I wasn't hampered by the same issues you were, as I rated the episodes 8/10 and 9/10 respectively. I really enjoyed it.

Then again, I really enjoyed Fair Haven and Spirit Folk. So when it comes to Voyager, what do I know? ;)

One thing I learned quickly around here is that my Trek opinions are quite often a bit unconventional. Just look at my ratings in my sig and marvel at how much you disagree with me. ;)
 
Well I grew up with a father who was in the military, who also collected a lot of WWII stuff and I learned about WWII at an early age.

I'm aware Star Trek is a Sci-Fi show, based around a fictional environment in the future.... but when a show.... any show of any genre, decides to take real life elements of our own past history to tell a story, one would expect that they'd at least get it right.... or even at the very least, close.

The Hirogen didn't exactly "Create" these holodeck programs, they found them in the data banks and modified them to suit their own objectives.... this in no way relates to asking Nelix to make Washington DC, because these files already existed in the computer, which would have been based around previously documented historical points in time.

I mean, in past episodes of other ST Series, the individual would state the location, environment, time period, etc. and the computer would do the rest, minus a few modifications here and there.... with such a vast computer system as they have in the future, you'd think it'd be pretty accurate.

The crew were basically programmed to be holo-characters, thus the way they talked, their movements, their actions wouldn't have matched their existing knowledge of the time or the weapons as holo-characters.

My point of the 70's cop sitcom remark was when Torres was shooting the handgun and every time she fired, the gun and her hand would jerk forward like it's somehow throwing the bullet, when in reality there'd be a recoil/kickback.....

Then you had the Nazi Uniforms where there was no armband w. the nazi logo, but they replaced it with the eagle and swastika patch which is normally found on the right chest-side of the uniform or the officer's hat.

I'm not bugged about the characters or the show in general, I'm bugged by the people who wrote and made up this two-part episode in that it appeared as though they simply didn't bother to do their homework for these episodes.

You guys can call it nit picking, but a part of my education/training in college and through my work was to focus on the small things like this in story development, character setup, environment, writing, etc., which eventually, if not done correctly, can add up to a shoddy story.

It's one thing to fudge sci-fi stories that probably won't ever exist in our real lives, and it's one thing to fudge what may occur in the future.... but when you're going to tell a story that's supposed to be something that actually happened in our past and actually is supposed to be based on truth.... fudging what really happened because you, the writer/director, are ignorant on what really happened, or simply don't care, is a crap way of making an episode and is shows pretty well through the episode.

Whenever I had to make up a storyboard, or the story overall, or work on character development for that story, I do research first, I ask those who have experience in certain fields to help me get a better understanding of what I'm trying to portray.... If it is based on something that exists or did exist in our lives, I confirm what I'm making up, matches to what actually happened. I'll never say that I get everything perfect, but doing this greatly reduces they chances of someone noticing the possible flaws, it makes the story more realistic.... more easier to relate to..... and when you're tossed a number of flaws that don't add up to the actual history of something in the story, it's hard to not get distracted by those flaws and be taken out of the environment the story is in.

I mean, there have been episodes in other ST shows that had their own flaws on this or that, but this episode in particular was imo, the worst offender of all the episodes I've seen yet in any ST series when it comes to aligning historical facts to the historical fiction they state is fact..... facts in which I mean, our real-life historical records which the ST universe is supposed to be roughly based on.

I mean, for most, I imagine they couldn't care less about the issues of this episode, but for me, if they took 5 minutes to look at official uniforms of that era, the weapons, the banners and flags used at the time..... and if they took the actors and gave them a 10 minute run down on how firearms are supposed to operate (kick-back, etc.) which every other show of the time, and even today, seem to be able to get a grasp on.... everything else would have worked out just fine for the episode and not much else would have been needed.

And Paris firing the M1 and complaining about how crude the weapons were, and as his last shot is spent, sending the ammo clip flying, you'd normally hear a loud metallic "PLING" noise as it flew out.... but it popped out without a peep.

For me personally, the episode reeks of lazy directing and lazy writing as well as lazy set/uniform design and that detracts from the overall concept of the episode. It could have been pretty good, but it ended up amateurish.

I did think that perhaps the reason why the banners and uniforms weren't authentic would be because of some people's hang ups of seeing official Nazi logos and uniforms that were actually used, so they toned down certain appearances of the swastika and such so that it wasn't as "Offensive" to some viewers..... but if that truly was the case, some people need to get a grip..... because this approach in the two-part episode was just tacky.

Then I thought that maybe they didn't have enough time or money to get all the proper research, props, training, etc..... so they just muddled through it.... which imo, if that was the case, then once again, they shouldn't have done the episodes in the first place if they were going to end up half-assed.

I guess I wasn't hampered by the same issues you were, as I rated the episodes 8/10 and 9/10 respectively. I really enjoyed it.

Then again, I really enjoyed Fair Haven and Spirit Folk. So when it comes to Voyager, what do I know? ;)

One thing I learned quickly around here is that my Trek opinions are quite often a bit unconventional. Just look at my ratings in my sig and marvel at how much you disagree with me. ;)

To each their own... if you liked it, you liked it.... for whatever reasons you see fit.... for me personally, I found it loaded with holes. Most cases I can bypass noticeable holes in a story and enjoy it for what it is.... but this one for me had so many holes, it sank.

The general story concept of the Hirogen taking over the ship and using the crew in holograms to hunt... and using WWII as a setting all seemed to make decent sense for a story, it sounded pretty interesting.... it had potential.... but missing out on some of the subtle things that made the era what it was, made it seem like something..... I dunno.... just bad.

And it is not often that I call any particular ST episode of any of the series as "bad" as I can usually appreciate any episode for what they are and what they attempt to do...... but this one just seemed like filler, like a 2 minute crap song an artist slaps on the end of their album to fill in space.
 
Last edited:
The crew were basically programmed to be holo-characters, thus the way they talked, their movements, their actions wouldn't have matched their existing knowledge of the time or the weapons as holo-characters.
The crew were brainwashed into thinking they were other people. They were not programmed. Besides, there's absolutely no reason for the Hirogen to have wanted to bother with super brainwashing them so that they acted exactly as they would have during that time period. They were more interested in creating interesting and hard to do kills. Why waste time and resources on exact historical records?

My point of the 70's cop sitcom remark was when Torres was shooting the handgun and every time she fired, the gun and her hand would jerk forward like it's somehow throwing the bullet, when in reality there'd be a recoil/kickback.....
Which is done in almost every tv show. it's the coconut effect.

You guys can call it nit picking, but a part of my education/training in college and through my work was to focus on the small things like this in story development, character setup, environment, writing, etc., which eventually can add up to leaving a shoddy story.
If this story had been "shoddy", you'd probably have us a lot more than you do. As it stands, "The Killing Game" is considered a very good episode to most.

I mean, there have been episodes in other ST shows that had their own flaws on this or that, but this episode in particular was imo, the worst offender of all the episodes I've seen yet in any ST series when it comes to aligning historical facts to the historical fiction they state is fact..... facts in which I mean, our real-life historical records which the ST universe is supposed to be roughly based on.
Star Trek's internal history is not our internal history. Who is to say the computer database was wrong? We've determined Star Trek's past is similar to our own, but it is not absolutely exactly like our own.

Also, you're nitpicking costumes and directing, not the storyline. I find it hard to swallow that a difference in uniform styles from what our history says to what the Trek history may be can actually pull away from the storyline itself, which is what you're proposing.

If the actors were sitting in a room reading the script out loud (with feeling) while wearing togas, it would still be a good script.

Costuming is only a small portion of what makes a storyline on screen good.
 
I fully understand your gripes with the episode/s, which you've explained in clear and fine deatail. But for me, purely as televisual entertaiment, I've always rated them as one of VOY's stronger entries.
 
Well I grew up with a father who was in the military, who also collected a lot of WWII stuff and I learned about WWII at an early age.

I'm aware Star Trek is a Sci-Fi show, based around a fictional environment in the future.... but when a show.... any show of any genre, decides to take real life elements of our own past history to tell a story, one would expect that they'd at least get it right.... or even at the very least, close.

The Hirogen didn't exactly "Create" these holodeck programs, they found them in the data banks and modified them to suit their own objectives.... this in no way relates to asking Nelix to make Washington DC, because these files already existed in the computer, which would have been based around previously documented historical points in time.

I mean, in past episodes of other ST Series, the individual would state the location, environment, time period, etc. and the computer would do the rest, minus a few modifications here and there.... with such a vast computer system as they have in the future, you'd think it'd be pretty accurate.

The crew were basically programmed to be holo-characters, thus the way they talked, their movements, their actions wouldn't have matched their existing knowledge of the time or the weapons as holo-characters.

My point of the 70's cop sitcom remark was when Torres was shooting the handgun and every time she fired, the gun and her hand would jerk forward like it's somehow throwing the bullet, when in reality there'd be a recoil/kickback.....

Then you had the Nazi Uniforms where there was no armband w. the nazi logo, but they replaced it with the eagle and swastika patch which is normally found on the right chest-side of the uniform or the officer's hat.

I'm not bugged about the characters or the show in general, I'm bugged by the people who wrote and made up this two-part episode in that it appeared as though they simply didn't bother to do their homework for these episodes.

You guys can call it nit picking, but a part of my education/training in college and through my work was to focus on the small things like this in story development, character setup, environment, writing, etc., which eventually, if not done correctly, can add up to a shoddy story.

It's one thing to fudge sci-fi stories that probably won't ever exist in our real lives, and it's one thing to fudge what may occur in the future.... but when you're going to tell a story that's supposed to be something that actually happened in our past and actually is supposed to be based on truth.... fudging what really happened because you, the writer/director, are ignorant on what really happened, or simply don't care, is a crap way of making an episode and is shows pretty well through the episode.

Whenever I had to make up a storyboard, or the story overall, or work on character development for that story, I do research first, I ask those who have experience in certain fields to help me get a better understanding of what I'm trying to portray.... If it is based on something that exists or did exist in our lives, I confirm what I'm making up, matches to what actually happened. I'll never say that I get everything perfect, but doing this greatly reduces they chances of someone noticing the possible flaws, it makes the story more realistic.... more easier to relate to..... and when you're tossed a number of flaws that don't add up to the actual history of something in the story, it's hard to not get distracted by those flaws and be taken out of the environment the story is in.

I mean, there have been episodes in other ST shows that had their own flaws on this or that, but this episode in particular was imo, the worst offender of all the episodes I've seen yet in any ST series when it comes to aligning historical facts to the historical fiction they state is fact..... facts in which I mean, our real-life historical records which the ST universe is supposed to be roughly based on.

I mean, for most, I imagine they couldn't care less about the issues of this episode, but for me, if they took 5 minutes to look at official uniforms of that era, the weapons, the banners and flags used at the time..... and if they took the actors and gave them a 10 minute run down on how firearms are supposed to operate (kick-back, etc.) which every other show of the time, and even today, seem to be able to get a grasp on.... everything else would have worked out just fine for the episode and not much else would have been needed.

And Paris firing the M1 and complaining about how crude the weapons were, and as his last shot is spent, sending the ammo clip flying, you'd normally hear a loud metallic "PLING" noise as it flew out.... but it popped out without a peep.

For me personally, the episode reeks of lazy directing and lazy writing as well as lazy set/uniform design and that detracts from the overall concept of the episode. It could have been pretty good, but it ended up amateurish.

I did think that perhaps the reason why the banners and uniforms weren't authentic would be because of some people's hang ups of seeing official Nazi logos and uniforms that were actually used, so they toned down certain appearances of the swastika and such so that it wasn't as "Offensive" to some viewers..... but if that truly was the case, some people need to get a grip..... because this approach in the two-part episode was just tacky.

Then I thought that maybe they didn't have enough time or money to get all the proper research, props, training, etc..... so they just muddled through it.... which imo, if that was the case, then once again, they shouldn't have done the episodes in the first place if they were going to end up half-assed.

I guess I wasn't hampered by the same issues you were, as I rated the episodes 8/10 and 9/10 respectively. I really enjoyed it.

Then again, I really enjoyed Fair Haven and Spirit Folk. So when it comes to Voyager, what do I know? ;)

One thing I learned quickly around here is that my Trek opinions are quite often a bit unconventional. Just look at my ratings in my sig and marvel at how much you disagree with me. ;)

To each their own... if you liked it, you liked it.... for whatever reasons you see fit.... for me personally, I found it loaded with holes. Most cases I can bypass noticeable holes in a story and enjoy it for what it is.... but this one for me had so many holes, it sank.

The general story concept of the Hirogen taking over the ship and using the crew in holograms to hunt... and using WWII as a setting all seemed to make decent sense for a story, it sounded pretty interesting.... it had potential.... but missing out on some of the subtle things that made the era what it was, made it seem like something..... I dunno.... just bad.

And it is not often that I call any particular ST episode of any of the series as "bad" as I can usually appreciate any episode for what they are and what they attempt to do...... but this one just seemed like filler, like a 2 minute crap song an artist slaps on the end of their album to fill in space.
Sounds as if you expected Star Trek to do a documentary on WWII with all the great attention to detail you're asking for. Plus Trek is a show for the general audience. Things are toned down on such a show because it has to meet approval from a ratings board.

Might I suggest "Band of Brothers" instead of Star Trek next time.
 
The Prime Directive states not to mess with pre-warp societies. The Hirogen were advanced. I think it might also say don't just give people technology, but they didn't, they traded the knowledge in exchange for safe passage.

Having said that, that two-parter is what made me give Voyager a chance after ten years of ignoring it. I'm glad it did. It's a fun episode. Seeing Tom Paris as a Brooklyn born Private a la Pvt Reiben in Saving Private Ryan brings a smile to my face.

My only complaint, because I'm not big on uniform errors (they happen in real life, too, so it's an unwinnable battle), is no one has a BAR, and they mention they stole German weapons but they're using American ones. I can let that slide, though, it's just a budget limit and script typo.

Besides, that's the first time we saw someone use the holodeck for one of the big three most OBVIOUS things people would use it for; historical revenge fantasy. The other two obvious functions are advanced simulation/training and... well, you know. You know.

One of the first things I'd do with a holodeck is put myself in World War II with an F-14 armed to the teeth or a Predator suit with Predator capabilities. You know it'd be ridiculously fun. World War II is one of the most common historical periods to fantasize about "what if..." or "what would I do?", so it was about time we same something like that instead of %$^&ing holo-novels. I mean could you get anymore boring?
 
I guess I wasn't hampered by the same issues you were, as I rated the episodes 8/10 and 9/10 respectively. I really enjoyed it.

Then again, I really enjoyed Fair Haven and Spirit Folk. So when it comes to Voyager, what do I know? ;)

One thing I learned quickly around here is that my Trek opinions are quite often a bit unconventional. Just look at my ratings in my sig and marvel at how much you disagree with me. ;)

To each their own... if you liked it, you liked it.... for whatever reasons you see fit.... for me personally, I found it loaded with holes. Most cases I can bypass noticeable holes in a story and enjoy it for what it is.... but this one for me had so many holes, it sank.

Totally cool. You are not the only Trek fan who breaks things down in Trek differently than I do. Everyone sees it differently. I wouldn't call your opinions "nitpicking", it's simply a matter of looking at things from a different perspective. My Trek opinions seem to be a bit more superficial, as I tend to look at episodes simply on how much I am entertained. I completely respect you guys who dig a bit deeper into the stories.
 
Hello.... Over the weekend we watched the two-part "The Killing Game" from Season 4 (breakdown: the Hirogen take over Voyager and subject the crew to various holodeck programs where they're continually hunted)

I hated the whole Hirogen story arc completely. The aliens were such a blatant rip off of the Predator series and worse they were portrayed as Predators 'light.'
 
Hello.... Over the weekend we watched the two-part "The Killing Game" from Season 4 (breakdown: the Hirogen take over Voyager and subject the crew to various holodeck programs where they're continually hunted)

Am I the only one who was disappointed by the historical inaccuracy of this episode, poor story line, actors handling the WWII firearms like some poor 70's crime sitcom, how the German uniforms, flags, symbols were inaccurate, how the Germans and Americans only seemed to have two firearms at their disposal (Luger/Kar98 - Colt/M1 Garand) and a slew of other poor attempts of telling history?

Sure they got a few things right in the story..... but overall, it was poorly executed, and not to mention Janeway's kick in the nards to the Prime Directive of handing the Hirogen Federation Technology...... plus the fact that the entire episode seemed to give the impression that WWII only consisted of the Germans, "Americans" and the occupied French.....

I dunno.... I always figured if you're going to make an episode relating to our history/past.... you'd do your home work and make it accurate, or don't do it at all.

They only showed the germans, americans, and french. That DOES NOT mean that they were ignoring everyone else. It just happened to be the setting of the story.
 
Hello.... Over the weekend we watched the two-part "The Killing Game" from Season 4 (breakdown: the Hirogen take over Voyager and subject the crew to various holodeck programs where they're continually hunted)

I hated the whole Hirogen story arc completely. The aliens were such a blatant rip off of the Predator series and worse they were portrayed as Predators 'light.'


Really????!!!! I NEVER saw any comparison! The Predator series seemed to have no depth to me. At least with the Hirogen, you get some insight into their culture.
 
It was this episode that got me interested in WWII History, so I think it did something right.
 
Hello.... Over the weekend we watched the two-part "The Killing Game" from Season 4 (breakdown: the Hirogen take over Voyager and subject the crew to various holodeck programs where they're continually hunted)

I hated the whole Hirogen story arc completely. The aliens were such a blatant rip off of the Predator series and worse they were portrayed as Predators 'light.'
How far did you think they were going to go in showing them kill on a general audience show?
 
The crew were brainwashed into thinking they were other people. They were not programmed.

Brainwashing is Programming of the Mind... they are one in the same.... the fact that they required devices to keep them into character is also a suggestion of Programming.

Besides, there's absolutely no reason for the Hirogen to have wanted to bother with super brainwashing them so that they acted exactly as they would have during that time period. They were more interested in creating interesting and hard to do kills. Why waste time and resources on exact historical records?
Because what I'm talking about is basic writting of the story and the training the actors got with operating the props they were given. They already explained in the episode that some of the character's attributes were coming through in their holodeck scenarios, so I can over look that aspect.... my issue was towards their handling of the weapons/props.... I'm sure the Hirogen didn't train every one of the crew on how to operate those weapons or the general lingo of the era, it came with the holodeck program, which, if one wanted to take this to the ST universe explanation, the computer would have known how to design the uniforms accurately and the computer would have been able to obtain the proper physics of the firearms they were using, in that they'd have kick back/recoil, thus forcing Torres's hands to recoil back a bit per shot fired, rather then her "Pew Pew'ing" the gun as if she was throwing the bullets out of the gun..... the holodeck would have programmed the proper sounds of the M1 snapping the metal clip out with a loud "Pling", etc.

Heck if the holodeck can program accurate bars, locations, smells, tastes, people, etc. through TNG, DS9 and Voyager.... why suddenly would the Holodeck make these obvious blunders?

It wouldn't, the logical answer is that the creators of the episode screwed up & didn't pay attention.

Which is done in almost every tv show. it's the coconut effect.
I wasn't talking about substituted sounds with my example of Torres.... I was talking about her hand motion when the gun was fired. I'm well aware of the substituted sounds used in Film/TV.

The only comment I made on sound was when Paris's M1 emptied, which lacked any sound at all.

If this story had been "shoddy", you'd probably have us a lot more than you do. As it stands, "The Killing Game" is considered a very good episode to most.
That's of course subjective to the individual and like I said, I imagined to the average viewer, most wouldn't notice these things or perhaps just not care.... in my view it's one of the worst ST episodes I've ever seen which has more to do with the creators of the episodes rather then the actual story.

Star Trek's internal history is not our internal history. Who is to say the computer database was wrong? We've determined Star Trek's past is similar to our own, but it is not absolutely exactly like our own.
How do you know it's not tied into our own internal, factual history and that ST is based on some "similar" past as our own?

Sure the whole Khan Singh super race thing isn't actually true to our past history, but considering that concept was created before that time became our past, it doesn't relate to this as an accurate example.... since WWII really occurred before TOS aired, and occurred before this episode.... WWII's reference in many ST episodes was revolved around the Actual WWII and what occurred during it that we all grew up learning about.

Also, you're nitpicking costumes and directing, not the storyline. I find it hard to swallow that a difference in uniform styles from what our history says to what the Trek history may be can actually pull away from the storyline itself, which is what you're proposing.
It can, and it does.... as an example, how about you take a story that claims to represent the War of 1812, toss in British "Red Coats" into the story, but have them wearing purple coats..... and then tell me that wouldn't detract from the overall story. Or as another example, have them carrying M-16's and tell me that wouldn't detract from the actual story.

As I said, I found nothing really wrong with the story itself (Besides the Prime Directive offense at the end) it's these aspects I mentioned that detract from the overall story in that if someone who actually knows a thing or two about the historical aspects of what's being explained saw this, they would be taken out of the element of the story because you don't actually "Feel" you're there in the story.... because the elements of that story are not real, or at the very least, looks real.

If the actors were sitting in a room reading the script out loud (with feeling) while wearing togas, it would still be a good script.

Costuming is only a small portion of what makes a storyline on screen good.
I already said that these are small parts to the overall story.... where if one thing was wrong it wouldn't be very noticeable or could be easily ignored.... but with a collection of errors in these "small" things, it can and will detract from the story itself, because it's not just what you hear that tells you the whole story, it's also what you see..... especially for film/tv.

-------------

As another thing to add to my gripes about this episode.... there was that part when Janeway was being chased by the Hirogen through the ship and she comes across the area where the Holo emitters were damaged/not completed. She led the Hirogen to this area and he fell for it, walked into the area where the holo emitters didn't work, lost his K98.... but then Janeway picks it up and chases after him.....

.... where the hell did the K98 come from if the holo emitters didn't work there and the one the Hirogen had disappeared?

Even MemoryAlpha doesn't explain exactly what the heck happened:

http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/The_Killing_Game,_Part_II_%28episode%29

".....With her injured leg she can't move as fast as he can. However, she finds an area where the holoemitters do not reach, gets him to move his weapon into it, and then knocks him down, seizing his weapon. Janeway asks him to tell his hunters to stand down but he attacks her and she shoots him."

When watching the episode, he walks into it and it vanishes from his hands.... but then it's on the ground, perfectly fine. :vulcan:



Sounds as if you expected Star Trek to do a documentary on WWII with all the great attention to detail you're asking for. Plus Trek is a show for the general audience. Things are toned down on such a show because it has to meet approval from a ratings board.

Might I suggest "Band of Brothers" instead of Star Trek next time.

Seen it... even it has flaws, but that's a different topic.... I wasn't expecting to have a 100% authentic WWII reference, nor did I ever claim anything of the sort, but there are flaws in those episodes which I haven't seen since the 70's, early 80's..... and I found that through many of the details ST has kept to over the years through similar references, the amount of blundering in the development in this story is pretty surprising and simply isn't up to snuff with other episodes.

None of what I have point out is some unjust amounts of attention to detail..... everybody with a grade 9 education should know what the nazi flag looks like, everybody should know that the greater majority of uniforms of the time for german officers had the arm bands.... and it doesn't take any great amount of study or education/experience to know that firearms have a level of kickback/recoil, thus it shouldn't have been too hard to act like they're producing some kick back, rather then shooting lasers and throwing the gun forward to lob the bullet and expect to actually hit anything.

Believe it or not, but many of these things should be common sense, maybe not for the average viewer, but for those creating the episodes, it should be common sense.
 
How far did you think they were going to go in showing them kill on a general audience show?

I'm sure you've seen the TNG Episode Conspiracy. When Riiker and Picard kill the aliens that are inside Star Fleet personnel exposing his chest cavity on TV and then his head explodes that has to be one of the most graphic scenes I've ever seen on television.

Point being - the Predators light err Hirogen were a terrible rip off from cinema.
 
How far did you think they were going to go in showing them kill on a general audience show?

I'm sure you've seen the TNG Episode Conspiracy. When Riiker and Picard kill the aliens that are inside Star Fleet personnel exposing his chest cavity on TV and then his head explodes that has to be one of the most graphic scenes I've ever seen on television.

Point being - the Predators light err Hirogen were a terrible rip off from cinema.
"Conspiracy" was before the TV parental ratings system was set up. Due to such a thing now, you can't do certain effects such as that without in affecting those parental ratings now.
 
How far did you think they were going to go in showing them kill on a general audience show?

I'm sure you've seen the TNG Episode Conspiracy. When Riiker and Picard kill the aliens that are inside Star Fleet personnel exposing his chest cavity on TV and then his head explodes that has to be one of the most graphic scenes I've ever seen on television.

Point being - the Predators light err Hirogen were a terrible rip off from cinema.

Seriously, I STILL don't see how the Hirogen are like the Predators, other than the Hirogen are (p)redators.
 
I wasn't talking about substituted sounds with my example of Torres.... I was talking about her hand motion when the gun was fired. I'm well aware of the substituted sounds used in Film/TV.

The only comment I made on sound was when Paris's M1 emptied, which lacked any sound at all.

The coconut effect can also apply to motions or sights. For example real blood at a real crim scene is not bright red like it is on tv and in the movies. But, they make it that color because that is what the audience expects to see.

How do you know it's not tied into our own internal, factual history and that ST is based on some "similar" past as our own?

Sure the whole Khan Singh super race thing isn't actually true to our past history, but considering that concept was created before that time became our past, it doesn't relate to this as an accurate example.... since WWII really occurred before TOS aired, and occurred before this episode.... WWII's reference in many ST episodes was revolved around the Actual WWII and what occurred during it that we all grew up learning about.

How about "Future's End" as another good example?

WWII references in Trek were based on our WWII, but there is nothing to indicate that it was exactly the same.

Just because something is based on a history we are familiar with doesn't mean that the history of that universe is exactly the same as ours.

You know this is a valid point.

It can, and it does.... as an example, how about you take a story that claims to represent the War of 1812, toss in British "Red Coats" into the story, but have them wearing purple coats..... and then tell me that wouldn't detract from the overall story. Or as another example, have them carrying M-16's and tell me that wouldn't detract from the actual story.

Because that is exactly the same as using a patch instead of an armband.

---------------

Janeway got the rifle from a dead American soldier in the hallway and hid it underneath the rubble just inside the parameter of the holoemitter.

----------------

It's kind of a mountain to molehill thing anyway, though. I suppose in the grand scheme, it really doesn't matter. :shrug: :sigh:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top