... but she seems to be the only regular cast member that refuses to be deferential to Picard. I saw Samaritan Snare yesterday, and she bluntly orders Picard to report to starbase 515 for a medical examination. She's the only one who really seems to treat him as an equal, not a superior.
Even Beverly (who has the fullest right to do the same thing as Chief Medical Officer) would probably hesitate strongly before ordering Picard to do such and so - she'd much rather suggest he do so. Riker would probably also make d*mn sure and triple check with his fellow officers before relieving Picard of duty. (Of course, he would need a more exceptional case than Beverly to overrule Picard.)
Why is that? Is Pulaski just a selfconfident character? Or does age also come into play? ( Pulaski seems closer in age to Picard than of any the other regular cast members?)
Also, could this be an in-universe reason that Pulaski isn't on board for longer than a single year? (I know we have a reason Beverly came back, but I don't think we're ever given an in-universe reason for Pulaski leaving?)
Even Beverly (who has the fullest right to do the same thing as Chief Medical Officer) would probably hesitate strongly before ordering Picard to do such and so - she'd much rather suggest he do so. Riker would probably also make d*mn sure and triple check with his fellow officers before relieving Picard of duty. (Of course, he would need a more exceptional case than Beverly to overrule Picard.)
Why is that? Is Pulaski just a selfconfident character? Or does age also come into play? ( Pulaski seems closer in age to Picard than of any the other regular cast members?)
Also, could this be an in-universe reason that Pulaski isn't on board for longer than a single year? (I know we have a reason Beverly came back, but I don't think we're ever given an in-universe reason for Pulaski leaving?)
Last edited: