• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Dilithium vs. Lithium

doctorwho 03

Captain
Captain
I was just reading the thread about the NX-01 and whether it used Dilithium or not, and I just had a thought about the Dilithium vs Lithium debate of the TOS era. What if both crystals were used to run the Enterprise, with dilithium handling the matter/antimatter reactions and lithium handling power distribution. This remains consistent with early episodes of TOS like "Mudds Women" which talks about lithium being needed to power the ship.

If this has already been discussed, I apologize for digging this back up.
 
It's probably best to keep in mind that "Mudd's Women", being a very early script, was made well before the Writer's Bible was really finalized. Lithium Batteries, in the 1960s, was something 'new' and 'futuristic' to the public, but was quickly entering the public consciousness. In a hurry lithium was regraded to 'dilithium' to be 'lithium even moreso', like tritanium, tri-cobalt bombs, and so on...
 
Lithium is a light, soft metal (practically like butter) that is highly flammable and chemically reactive. The idea that it forms "crystals" on anything other than a microscopic scale is pretty silly. It certainly doesn't form crystals like those used to portray dilithium. That's the problem with using known materials or devices (lithium, lasers, etc) instead of fictional ones (dilithium, phasers, etc) -- GR realized that and fixed those problems early on.
 
So the easiest choice would be to say that "dilithium" is not a material consisting of two lithium atoms, but a material that contains two lithium atoms.

That's perfectly correct real-world chemistry jargon. It merely assumes that the listener already knows what sort of crystal is being discussed - and then adds the all-important tidbit that this is the two-Li variant of it, and not, say, the three-Li version that is unsuited for starship energy production.

In other words, "lithium crystals" would be a family of crystalline substances, of which "dilithium" would be especially useful for regulating m/am reactions; "trilithium" would be a common waste product, and would have interesting explosive and fusion-suppressing properties as well; and "paralithium" would be a variant where the Li atoms are in the "para" positions in relation to each other around some sort of a core structure, not in "ortho" or "meso" or "trans" or "cis" as also commonly used in chemistry, and would be a somewhat less efficient alternative to "dilithium".

It would then be correct for Scotty to say that the ship ran on "lithium crystals" if the ship used orthodilithium or paradilithium or monolithium or trilithium or perhaps dodecalithium. And we might speculate that Starfleet vessels indeed ran on a wide range of these "less than perfect" lithium types in the early years or centuries, and that only the thoroughbred superships at the very front lines were configured for the pure (ortho?)dilithium exclusively, or were provided with sufficient amounts of this rare substance.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Very well put, Timo. I was actually thinking along the same lines. Dilithium could be short for something like triptodilithium xenocarbinium and 'lithium' and later 'dilithium' are just acceptable shortenings of it.

Also, the 'lithium cracking' referenced in 'Where No Man Has Gone Before' could be akin to 'atom smashing' - in that it is some exotic process that converts 'regular' lithium into the material useful aboard starships - although clearly dilithium is found naturally on some planets.
 
I think they knew what they were doing when they took Gary Mitchell to a planet full of lithium, but even then underestimated the dose.
 
^ This seems virtually required to me, since "lithium cracking" otherwise doesn't take a hell of a lot of effort.
 
Thought I'd chime in, since I started the Dilithium and NX-01 thread mentioned above. I like Timo's explanation quite a lot, and have always sort of subscribed (in my head) to Praetor's proposal that "lithium", as in "lithium cracking station" is merely a sort shorthand; it's really 'lithium, the apostrophy holding the place of the syllable "di" (or any of Timo's suggestions). That's sort of the approach I've intended to take in my little story.
 
As SonicRanger has pointed out, normal Lithium are pretty useless for what we are told dilithium crystals are expected to do in Star Trek. However, after 300 years of applied science and materials technology, its quite possible that a compound has been created that does things we wouldn't expect that element to be capable of. For an example from today, I'm pretty sure that people 300 years ago didn't have any idea that we would find silicon (i.e., sand, in its common form) an extremely useful, and (in final processed form) expensive material. So, yes, it might be conceivable that what is to us an exotic process combines lithium with other elements and makes a crystal. The non-canon TNG Tech manual does indicate its a compound:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilithium_%28Star_Trek%29

It might even be possible that lithium and dilithium crystals are created in extreme cosmic events, such as nova/supernova explosions, or by massive conventional bodies (such as failed stars, like Jupiter). The relatively desolate bodies we see it being mined on might simply be recipients of debris from some cosmic event, or the remains of a gas giant after a tremendous force has ripped away its atmosphere and forged dilithium and other elements on the surface of its core. These bodies might have been partially terraformed to permit a breathable atmosphere, and not necessarily in recent times.

The common or slang name for this this hypothetical compound could be lithium (and dilithium crystals might as well be a compound rather than merely an element of the same name, if we believe our source), because its the chief constituent element. The technological process of harvesting or creating it might be called "lithium cracking", much in the way we crack oil and reformulate it into substances we are interested in. Whether its a cheap substitute for rarer dilithium, and whether its use was discovered prior to dilithium, depends upon a lot of assumptions. It can, apparently, in a pinch be substituted for dilithium so that a starship can 'limp home' to a repair dock. And this may explain whey freighters in TOS seem to have extremely low speeds compared to 1701 (WF 2, I believe, vs. WF 6 or 8). Lithium as we know it today does, however, have some other interesting properties -- which is one indicator of why it might have been chosen in the first place and perhaps gives us reasons we might not want to assume its completely useless.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lithium

In terms of dilithium just being two lithium atoms in a molecule, AFAIK atoms generally don't 'like' to exist in the singular (monoatomic), they generally are found bound together to the same element or to other elements. Yes, diatomic would be two atoms, but it seems fairly clear that the di- and tri-prefix to element names in Star Trek are being used to indicate some sort of exotic materials that (when their properties are discussed) are beyond our physical sciences today. One of the novels (I don't remember which one) came up with an explanation, something about one of the atoms being bound in warp time, or some such thing. Which is about as good an explanation as anything if you want a material 12 times harder than diamond that you can move around without an antigrav. Unfortunately Memory Beta doesn't seem to reference that novel in its expanded universe discussion of dilithium.

http://memory-beta.wikia.com/wiki/Dilithium

As to it being a slang, that might be a possible explanation, but its a fairly consistent, very briefly used slang. For reasons we all know, the show's 'shakedown cruise'. I tend to take a strong look at the expanded Trek universe and, if nothing else is available, filter continuity issues through that. Frankly, I'm a bit insulted by "ST:Enterprise" having everyone in the universe already using dilithium and antimatter to power their starships, as it contradicts "Balance of Terror". In any case I prefer to believe in gradual technological change rather than sudden changes and then centuries of relative stagnation. So, Warp 5 ships? Not a great idea in 2151, and two day trips to Kronos even worse yet. Yes, the "stupid fans" noticed that. In "The Cage", there is clear discussion of a relatively recent break-through in propulsion technology (which 1701 is implied to have), decreasing travel time. In the "Star Trek Spaceflight Chronology" and the novel based in part on it, "The Final Reflection", dilithium's propulsion enhancing possibilities are a recently discovered property (c. 2230), courtesy of TAS's Carter Winston, that make the revolutionary Constitution class possible. So, to me -- prior to the discovery that dilithium could be cut into faceted crystals and used for focusing/concentrating energy in A/MA reactors -- a synthetic substance called Lithium crystals played a similar role, for an indeterminate time (originating sometime between ENT and TOS).

And, no, I don't particularly endorse the TNG Tech Manuals explanation that dilithium is effectively 'nature's way' of making a M/AM reactor. I prefer to believe that humanoid technology provides the magnetic fields containing the AM all the way from storage until it smashes into the matter, and the crystals then properly channel the energy from that annihilation -- but that's just me. Having the reaction take place inside the crystals at best wouldn't help the reaction along and at worst would simply blow the crystals into atoms.

Thus endeth the rant. :devil:
 
Last edited:
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the di, tri, etc. prefix usually refer to the number of neutrons a substance has? Could it be, therefore, that Lithium is "doped" somehow with extra neutrons, turning it into Di-Lithium, the scientific term for such a substance is, "alotrope" I think? As such it could concievably be naturally occuring or synthetic. Such substances are, however, inherently unstable and tend to decay over time, and need to be periodically 'redoped' by adding new neutrons. Whether or not this "doping" would turn lithium into a crystal, I do not know, but this might explain why subjecting it to neutron radiation, as was done in ST:IV, might cause it to recrystalize? Perhaps when fewer ships used Dilithium it was preferable to simply use fresh crystals, but by TNG era it had become so scarce as to require 'recharging' or recrystalizing the existing supply?
 
It may help to ease the sting of the widespread references to everyone using dilithium if we imagine that there are different ways that dilithium could be used in warp engines that could represent an evolutionary progression. Perhaps using raw crystals is one step, refined/compressed ones another, an articulating crystal frame a third, and better and better versions of the compound are still being worked on all the time; more advanced uses might see something like a M/A reaction swirl-chamber lined with layers of synthetic dilithium. Clearly it is valuable, and the trilithium byproducts even seem important, so I don't mind imagining that many aliens would have an interest in it and just wouldn't imagine them all using it in quite the same way.

Much harder for me to rationalize than the "lithium" reference, I do wonder why the valuable dilithium was being "cracked" at an automated facility. I don't want to start to think dorky fanboyesque thoughts like the place being protected by automated phaser emplacements or something like that, but criminy, can the place really be SO out of the way that there's no concern someone will waltz in and take the clearly valuable material?
 
Maybe something still has to be done to the lithium after 'cracking' to make it useful. Something that a Starship can do with some effort, but your Average Joe Spaceship can't, and which is prohibitively difficult enough, when combined with the distance of the facility, to make it an unlikely target for pirates.
 
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the di, tri, etc. prefix usually refer to the number of neutrons a substance has?

Not to my knowledge. "Dihydrogen sulfide" is a substance with two H plus one S; I've never heard the two-neutron isotope of hydrogen, tritium or T being referred to as "dihydrogen".

But of course we can never be sure whether the "di" in dilithium is a prefix. The name of the substance could be a single undivided word, perhaps because the substance was first found on a place named Dilithos, or discovered by a guy named Dilith. Similarly, "tri" ain't always a prefix for three - say, "tribology" is unrelated to the number three, as is "tribe" or "tribute".

(Do we even get the spelling from any canonical source? Perhaps it's really "deletium", thus named because it deletes something?)

As long as we play semantics, "lithium cracking" might refer to a process where lithium is used for cracking substance X, perhaps a hydrocarbon. The facility wouldn't produce starship-grade lithium - it would consume it in the cracking process. But it would have a store of it for that very purpose, a store that Kirk could raid in his great need.

Or then "lithium cracking" doesn't refer to the petrochemical process of cutting long (carbon) chains, but to a more physical cracking of lithium-containing crystals in the fashion necessary for creating the m/am-regulating facets...

Timo Saloniemi
 
Very good points, Timo, particularly in regard to not knowing what exactly 'lithium cracking' is.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top