| |
 |
|
July 22 2009, 10:29 PM
|
#196
|
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
Captain Robert April wrote:

Nobody said it was an efficient planet eater. In fact, its table manners are dowright horrid.
|
Heh.
But it's kind of the point. It wasn't supposed to destroy the planet down to the last atom. It was just to reduce it to rubble, refuel (whatever it needed) from the mass now around, and then move on. It's a war machine, first and foremost.
__________________
PHD In Star Trek Technology
Certified by Jaynz Information Group
|
|
|
July 23 2009, 01:41 AM
|
#197
|
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
Vance wrote:

Captain Robert April wrote:

Nobody said it was an efficient planet eater. In fact, its table manners are dowright horrid.
|
Heh.
But it's kind of the point. It wasn't supposed to destroy the planet down to the last atom. It was just to reduce it to rubble, refuel (whatever it needed) from the mass now around, and then move on. It's a war machine, first and foremost.
|
That's true... but the bigger it is, the bigger the proton beam can be. Therefore, the faster it can chop up said planet.
I'll be home tomorrow... so I might sketch out some ideas. does anyone know of any neat concepts they've seen over the years of an updated machine?
|
|
|
July 23 2009, 02:40 AM
|
#198
|
|
Commodore
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
The DDM as shown in the original effects shots would be about 13,330 feet long if you go by the size of the Enterprise (not the shuttle or Constellation). I built a 3D model of it back around 1990 and determined the size by comparing the Enterprise to it when it's in profile in front of the DDM to the DDM's maw height.
__________________
Click to see a music video I directed: BP Is Creepy
|
|
|
July 23 2009, 02:54 AM
|
#199
|
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
__________________
D.C. Fontana on Roddenberry's bad ideas: "I objected to Troi having three breasts... How are you going to line them up? Vertically, horizontally, or what?"
|
|
|
July 23 2009, 04:16 AM
|
#200
|
|
Rear Admiral, Writer
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
^
TOSR is so silly, and that first link proves it. The original footage looked so much better, than the "improved" footage. I mean, TOSR is basically just an attempt to make the BEST "old cheesy" effects you can make, which backfires, because it looks even worse.
|
|
|
July 23 2009, 04:58 AM
|
#201
|
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: running from Evil Cheese
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
Herkimer Jitty wrote:

Apparently someone hasn't heard of a napkin.
This is why I don't buy nice clothes for the Doomsday Machine anymore.
|
Captain Robau uses the Doomsday Machine as a French tickler.
__________________
"We're sorry to bother you at a time like this...we would have come earlier, but your husband wasn't dead then."
- Lt. Frank Drebin, Police Squad!
|
|
|
July 23 2009, 08:12 PM
|
#202
|
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Off The Deep End
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
BolianAdmiral wrote:

^
TOSR is so silly, and that first link proves it. The original footage looked so much better, than the "improved" footage. I mean, TOSR is basically just an attempt to make the BEST "old cheesy" effects you can make, which backfires, because it looks even worse.
|
Are you joking? With the original show featuring phaser effects that looked like Chuck Jones animation? USS Constellation with the strings visible, half the details missing, a flying wafflecone that looks like it was made out of construction paper?
Don't get me wrong, it's always been one of my favorite episodes (and all time favorite original series music suite) but the original FX were just plain ghastly.
__________________
Star Trek - Genesis: a newtype_alpha production.
You can do what the rest of your shipmates do and get your coffee from the galley, you thirsty son of a b*tch!
|
|
|
July 23 2009, 08:15 PM
|
#203
|
|
Commodore
Location: Official forum sex god
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
BolianAdmiral wrote:

^
TOSR is so silly, and that first link proves it. The original footage looked so much better, than the "improved" footage. I mean, TOSR is basically just an attempt to make the BEST "old cheesy" effects you can make, which backfires, because it looks even worse.
|
Never seen an episode then have you?
Teasing aside it's all opinion. I think it looks much better remastered.
|
|
|
August 2 2009, 11:13 PM
|
#204
|
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Off The Deep End
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
TrekBBS-III: the Search for MadMan1701A.
Please tell me you're still working on this, Mad. Do not force me to release my flying monkeys...
__________________
Star Trek - Genesis: a newtype_alpha production.
You can do what the rest of your shipmates do and get your coffee from the galley, you thirsty son of a b*tch!
|
|
|
August 3 2009, 12:43 PM
|
#205
|
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
newtype_alpha wrote:

TrekBBS-III: the Search for MadMan1701A.
Please tell me you're still working on this, Mad. Do not force me to release my flying monkeys...
|
Hey, yeah, kind of.  I've lost some of my motivation... I'm trying to find it.
There's really not much left... detailing, and texturing.
Maybe I'll have something soon.
|
|
|
August 3 2009, 11:32 PM
|
#206
|
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
|
|
|
August 7 2009, 07:10 PM
|
#208
|
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
Ok, I have some progress! The modeling of the ship is finished. I'm fixing to start right up on the texturing. Since I built in so much of the detail this time, that should be easy.
Here's what I've got...
Between work, watching Stargate on DVD (for the first time  ) and everything going on, it's hard to get much time to work on this. Thankfully, work was slow today.
I finished the phaser banks, the torpedo tubes, the windows, and some greebling. On the windows, I did something different; instead of having them inset, like normal, I actually have them flush with the hull, with a external frame on the outside... kind of like an RV window.
What do you guys think?
|
|
|
August 9 2009, 11:00 PM
|
#210
|
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Off The Deep End
|
Re: USS Constellation, NCC-1017
That's ALOT of phaser armament for a ship this size.
__________________
Star Trek - Genesis: a newtype_alpha production.
You can do what the rest of your shipmates do and get your coffee from the galley, you thirsty son of a b*tch!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |
|